Marc J. Ackerman
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Child Abuse and Trauma
- Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Papers in
-
- Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse 4
- Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving 2
-
- Family Dynamics and Relationships 6
- Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies 2
Marc J. Ackerman
16 papers receiving 313 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- Applied Psychology 88
- Clinical Psychology 247
- Demography 145
- Anatomy 13
- Safety Research 45
Countries citing papers authored by Marc J. Ackerman
This map shows the geographic impact of Marc J. Ackerman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marc J. Ackerman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marc J. Ackerman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Marc J. Ackerman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marc J. Ackerman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marc J. Ackerman. The network helps show where Marc J. Ackerman may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 2 scholars most cited alongside Marc J. Ackerman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1997 | 161 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 46 | |
| 3 | Clinician's guide for child custody evaluations | 1994 | 43 |
| 4 | Essentials of Forensic Psychological Assessment | 1999 | 31 |
| 5 | 2005 | 30 | |
| 6 | Psychological Experts in Divorce Actions | 1998 | 22 |
| 7 | 2004 | 15 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 10 | |
| 9 | 1997 | 7 | |
| 10 | 1971 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2005 | 4 | |
| 12 | Child Custody Evaluation Practices: A 1996 Survey of Psychologists | 2016 | 4 |
| 13 | 1992 | 3 | |
| 14 | Psychological Experts in Divorce, Personal Injury, and Other Civil Actions | 1993 | 3 |
| 15 | 1999 | 2 | |
| 16 | 1999 | 1 | |
| 17 | Group Therapy Readiness Using Operant Techniques with Mental Retardates. | 1972 | 0 |
About Marc J. Ackerman
Marc J. Ackerman is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Demography, Gender Studies, Social Psychology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 17 papers that have together received 387 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Family Dynamics and Relationships (6 papers), Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (4 papers), Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (2 papers), Psychological Testing and Assessment (2 papers), Housing Market and Economics (2 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (2 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (2 papers) and Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (88 citations), Clinical Psychology (247 citations), Demography (145 citations), Anatomy (13 citations) and Safety Research (45 citations). Marc J. Ackerman has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Andrew W. Kane and James N. Bow. Their work appears in journals such as Professional Psychology Research and Practice, Journal of Clinical Psychology, Radiographics, Journal of Personality Assessment and Journal of Child Custody.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.