James Moore

2.6k citations
110 papers · 1.5k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

James Moore

95 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

James Moore
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • History and Philosophy of Science 490
  • General Psychology 31
  • History 211
  • Philosophy 166
  • Religious studies 59
Replace Johann Gottfried Herder with:
Johann Gottfried Herder
Robert J. Richards United States
Bernard Lightman Canada
Mary Midgley United Kingdom
Roy MacLeod Australia
Dorinda Outram United States
Gillian Beer United Kingdom
John Henry United Kingdom
John Passmore Australia
Bruce Mazlish United States
James Moore relative to Johann Gottfried Herder Johann Gottfried Herder's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Johann Gottfried Herder · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Moore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Moore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Moore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Moore. The network helps show where James Moore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Moore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Moore Line = papers co-authored together James Moore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 110 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1979214
2 1980194
3
Darwin: The Life of a Tormented Evolutionist
1991191
4 200977
5
History, humanity and evolution : essays for John C. Greene
198960
6 197949
7 200241
8 199635
9 199135
10 198132
11 201228
12 198627
13 198624
14 200923
15 198021
16 197720
17 200620
18 201518
19 198217
20 201014

About James Moore

James Moore is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, History and Philosophy of Science, Education, Political Science and International Relations and History, having authored 110 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolution and Science Education (15 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (7 papers), History of Science and Natural History (6 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (6 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (5 papers), Education and Islamic Studies (5 papers), Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (4 papers) and Scottish History and National Identity (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (490 citations), General Psychology (31 citations), History (211 citations), Philosophy (166 citations) and Religious studies (59 citations). James Moore has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Adrian Desmond, Michael Ruse, John C. Greene, Beth C. Rubin, Maria D. Avgerinou, Ronald Fernandes, Josef L. Altholz, Jane Teas, Sarah Blaffer Hrdy and Joseph Kennedy. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, Northern History, Journal of American History, The American Historical Review and Equity & Excellence in Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact