Jane Teas

37 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Jane Teas
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
  • Aquatic Science 352
  • Developmental Biology 60
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 312
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 193
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 179
Replace D. Craig Willcox with:
D. Craig Willcox United States
Ken D. Stark Canada
Jessica A. Grieger Australia
Franca Marangoni Italy
Amanat Ali Oman
Paul Lewandowski Australia
Suzette L. Pereira United States
Bernice K. Watt United States
Pilar Aranda Spain
Kozue Nakamura Japan
Jane Teas relative to D. Craig Willcox United States D. Craig Willcox's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×20×40×60×
D. Craig Willcox · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Teas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Teas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Teas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Teas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Teas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Teas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Teas. The network helps show where Jane Teas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Teas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Teas Line = papers co-authored together Jane Teas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998281
2 2004213
3 2001199
4 199594
5 200760
6 201260
7
Dietary seaweed (Laminaria) and mammary carcinogenesis in rats.
198460
8 200958
9
Could dietary seaweed reverse the metabolic syndrome?
200947
10 198246
11 198643
12 200143
13 198137
14 200736
15 201435
16 201135
17 198132
18 200430
19 200230
20 200426

About Jane Teas

Jane Teas is a scholar working on Aquatic Science, Social Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Molecular Biology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Seaweed-derived Bioactive Compounds (13 papers), Primate Behavior and Ecology (7 papers), Phytoestrogen effects and research (5 papers), Fatty Acid Research and Health (4 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (4 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (3 papers), Echinoderm biology and ecology (3 papers) and Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aquatic Science (352 citations), Developmental Biology (60 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (312 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (193 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (179 citations). Jane Teas has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and China. Frequent co-authors include James R. Hébert, Thomas G. Hurley, Lewis E. Braverman, Sam Pino, Alan T. Critchley, Jeffrey S Hampl, Barbara C. Olendzki, Yunsheng Ma, Mohammad R. Irhimeh and Lawrence H. Kushi. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Phycology, Nutrition and Cancer, Journal of Mammalogy, Journal of Nutrition and JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact