James Mitchell Crow

569 citations
40 papers · 416 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

James Mitchell Crow

32 papers receiving 411 citations

Peers

James Mitchell Crow
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Epidemiology 125
  • Cancer Research 45
  • Immunology 62
  • Microbiology 18
  • Dermatology 21
Replace Hao Cheng with:
Hao Cheng China
Zhixin Li China
Christine Youn United States
Ludovic Wiszniewski Switzerland
Vladislav Dolgachev United States
Sergei Pustylnikov United States
Quan Lin China
Hyun‐Hee Lee South Korea
Aaron Gardner United Kingdom
James Mitchell Crow relative to Hao Cheng China Hao Cheng's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Hao Cheng · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Mitchell Crow

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Mitchell Crow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Mitchell Crow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Mitchell Crow more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Mitchell Crow

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Mitchell Crow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Mitchell Crow. The network helps show where James Mitchell Crow may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside James Mitchell Crow, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Mitchell Crow Line = papers co-authored together James Mitchell Crow links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012168
2 202161
3 201134
4 201234
5 201225
6 201115
7 20129
8 20209
9 20168
10 20227
11
Outcomes of the Chemistry Discipline Network Mapping Exercises: Are the Threshold Learning Outcomes met?
20135
12 20135
13 20124
14 20233
15 20213
16 20213
17
The Chemistry Discipline Network: One year on
20123
18 19892
19 20122
20
Primary mucinous carcinoid tumour of the ovary: a case report.
20062

About James Mitchell Crow

James Mitchell Crow is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Molecular Biology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Physiology and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, having authored 40 papers that have together received 416 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (2 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (2 papers), Science, Research, and Medicine (2 papers), Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis (2 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (2 papers), Renal cell carcinoma treatment (1 paper), Higher Education Learning Practices (1 paper) and Marine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Epidemiology (125 citations), Cancer Research (45 citations), Immunology (62 citations), Microbiology (18 citations) and Dermatology (21 citations). James Mitchell Crow has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Mozhgan Shojaee, Glennys O’Brien, Madeleine Schultz, Sam Turner, David O. Cosgrove, C. Parsons, E. Wiltshaw, Elizabeth Benjamin, Jennifer Cooke and Tim Mould. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, British Journal of Cancer, Journal of Roman Archaeology and The New Scientist.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact