James M Wright

8.9k citations
176 papers · 6.4k · h-index 46

Impact in

Papers in

James M Wright

165 papers receiving 5.9k citations

Peers

James M Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 154
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 2.1k
  • Pharmacology 713
  • Family Practice 115
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 159
  • Neurology 444
Replace Fabrizio De Ponti with:
Fabrizio De Ponti Italy
Mervyn John Eadie Australia
Philippe P. Lechat France
W.J. Elliott United States
Jane Armitage United Kingdom
Thomas Hedner Sweden
Peter C. Rubin United Kingdom
Richard H. Grimm United States
Janice B. Schwartz United States
Peter L. Selby Canada
James M Wright relative to Fabrizio De Ponti Italy Fabrizio De Ponti's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.5×
Fabrizio De Ponti · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James M Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James M Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James M Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James M Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James M Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James M Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James M Wright. The network helps show where James M Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James M Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James M Wright Line = papers co-authored together James M Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 176 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009215
2 2018185
3 2014176
4 1998175
5 2009168
6 2013165
7 1985164
8 2012160
9 2012159
10 2009151
11 2008141
12 2010139
13 1993129
14
The double-edged sword of COX-2 selective NSAIDs.
2002120
15 2009113
16 2013113
17 2014113
18 2008112
19 2010104
20 2001103

About James M Wright

James M Wright is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pharmacology, Surgery, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Neurology, having authored 176 papers that have together received 6.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (77 papers), Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health (24 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (8 papers), Renin-Angiotensin System Studies (8 papers), Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection (7 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (7 papers), Diabetes Treatment and Management (6 papers) and Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (2.1k citations), Pharmacology (713 citations), Family Practice (115 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (159 citations) and Neurology (444 citations). James M Wright has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Vijaya Manav Musini, Balraj S Heran, Kenneth L Bassett, Stephen P Adams, Thomas L. Perry, Colin R. Dormuth, Gavin WK Wong, José Agustín Arguedas, François Gueyffier and Marco I Perez. Their work appears in journals such as Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PLoS ONE, BMJ Open, The Lancet and Blood Pressure Monitoring.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact