Nadège Robert

746 citations
8 papers · 449 · h-index 6

Impact in

  • Hematology top 5%
    • Erythropoietin and Anemia Treatment
    • Iron Metabolism and Disorders
    • Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments

Papers in

Nadège Robert

8 papers receiving 420 citations

Peers

Nadège Robert
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Hematology 146
  • Transplantation 17
  • Biochemistry 35
  • Internal Medicine 15
  • Genetics 34
Replace Christina Stern with:
Christina Stern Austria
Can Boğa Türkiye
K. Mohandas United States
Renate Thalhammer-Scherrer Austria
Collins Ja Netherlands
B. Löffler Germany
Williams Jd United Kingdom
Jouni Lauronen Finland
L.A.M. Frenken Netherlands
Guntram Deichsel Germany
Nadège Robert relative to Christina Stern Austria Christina Stern's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.5×
Christina Stern · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nadège Robert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nadège Robert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadège Robert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadège Robert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nadège Robert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadège Robert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadège Robert. The network helps show where Nadège Robert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nadège Robert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nadège Robert Line = papers co-authored together Nadège Robert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 2012204
2 2010101
3 201156
4 200834
5 200729
6 201519
7
Epoetin and Darbepoetin for Managing Anemia in Patients Undergoing Cancer Treatment
20135
8 20091

About Nadège Robert

Nadège Robert is a scholar working on Hematology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Oncology, Small Animals and Social Psychology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 449 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Erythropoietin and Anemia Treatment (3 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (2 papers), Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper), PARP inhibition in cancer therapy (1 paper), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (1 paper), Primate Behavior and Ecology (1 paper), Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (1 paper) and Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Hematology (146 citations), Transplantation (17 citations), Biochemistry (35 citations), Internal Medicine (15 citations) and Genetics (34 citations). Nadège Robert has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Gavin WK Wong, James M Wright, Julia Bohlius, Guido Schwarzer, Jerome Seidenfeld, Thomy Tonia, Chris Hyde, Annette Mettler, Olaf Weingart and Andreas Engert. Their work appears in journals such as Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, BMC Physiology, Cancer Research, Vaccine and Animal Welfare.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact