Blood Pressure Monitoring

1.5k papers and 21.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.5k papers published in Blood Pressure Monitoring in the last decades have received a total of 21.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Blood Pressure Monitoring usually cover Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (1.3k papers), Surgery (595 papers) and Complementary and alternative medicine (181 papers) specifically the topics of Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (1.1k papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (532 papers) and Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (452 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Blood Pressure Monitoring are William B. White, Eoin OʼBrien, Andrew Shennan, Thomas G. Pickering, Gianfranco Parati, Roland Asmar, Yutaka Imai, Paolo Palatini, Jan A. Staessen and George S. Stergiou.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Blood Pressure Monitoring

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Blood Pressure Monitoring. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Blood Pressure Monitoring.

Countries where authors publish in Blood Pressure Monitoring

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Blood Pressure Monitoring. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Blood Pressure Monitoring with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Blood Pressure Monitoring more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025