James Larkin

559 citations
37 papers · 285 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

James Larkin

29 papers receiving 278 citations

Peers

James Larkin
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Family Practice 81
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 47
  • Medical Terminology 1
  • Health 27
  • General Health Professions 70
Replace Bernard Appiah with:
Bernard Appiah United States
Marie Chisholm‐Burns United States
Kate Cox United Kingdom
Kyoungrae Jung United States
Kristen Rice United States
Elizabeth A. Bojarski United States
Iain Crinson United Kingdom
Stephanie Savory United States
Daniel Garrett United States
Marsha Rosenthal United States
James Larkin relative to Bernard Appiah United States Bernard Appiah's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Bernard Appiah · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Larkin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Larkin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Larkin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Larkin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Larkin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Larkin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Larkin. The network helps show where James Larkin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Larkin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Larkin Line = papers co-authored together James Larkin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202199
2 201741
3 202037
4 201917
5 202111
6 202211
7 20207
8 20186
9 20216
10 20195
11 20235
12 20214
13 20224
14 20213
15 20233
16 20253
17 20213
18 20223
19 20243
20 20212

About James Larkin

James Larkin is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, Epidemiology, Pharmacology and Family Practice, having authored 37 papers that have together received 285 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chronic Disease Management Strategies (11 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (10 papers), Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare (6 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (5 papers), Medication Adherence and Compliance (5 papers), Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (4 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (3 papers) and Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (81 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (47 citations), Medical Terminology (1 citation), Health (27 citations) and General Health Professions (70 citations). James Larkin has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United Kingdom and Saint Kitts and Nevis. Frequent co-authors include Susan M. Smith, Barbara Clyne, Andrew W. Murphy, Richard Lombard-Vance, Gerard J. Molloy, Lisa Hynes, Patricia Harrington, Frank Moriarty, Claire Collins and Tom Fahey. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, BJGP Open, Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, BMC Medical Education and PLoS Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact