James Kirk

5.5k citations
140 papers · 1.9k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

James Kirk

123 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

James Kirk
Comparison fields: 5 of 140
  • Instrumentation 254
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 687
  • Radiation 181
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 271
  • Otorhinolaryngology 46
Replace Jianfeng Wu with:
Jianfeng Wu China
Philip D. Allen United Kingdom
Tomohisa Uchida Japan
Henry C. Woodruff Netherlands
John J. Feldmeier United States
Michael Bremer Germany
Frédéric Leblond Canada
John W. Strohbehn United States
Martin D. Altschuler United States
Satoshi Nozawa Japan
James Kirk relative to Jianfeng Wu China Jianfeng Wu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×25.9×
Jianfeng Wu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Kirk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Kirk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Kirk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Kirk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Kirk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Kirk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Kirk. The network helps show where James Kirk may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Kirk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Kirk Line = papers co-authored together James Kirk links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 140 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1971203
2 198286
3 201569
4 201561
5
E and EAC rosetting lymphocytes in patients with carcinoma of bronchus I. Some parameters of the test and of its prognostic significance.
197548
6 202147
7 197247
8 201543
9 201742
10 202139
11 197737
12 196836
13 202434
14 201633
15 202233
16 196833
17 201831
18 202430
19 197529
20 201729

About James Kirk

James Kirk is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Control and Systems Engineering, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Instrumentation and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 140 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (33 papers), Magnetic Bearings and Levitation Dynamics (29 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (18 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (16 papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (15 papers), Electric Motor Design and Analysis (15 papers), Effects of Radiation Exposure (14 papers) and Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (254 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (687 citations), Radiation (181 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (271 citations) and Otorhinolaryngology (46 citations). James Kirk has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Nepal. Frequent co-authors include William M. Gray, E.R. Watson, T. E. Wheldon, P. J. Wheatley, M. J. Coe, Tom Louden, A. S. Michalowski, Jayne Orr, D. K. Anand and Munazza K. Alam. Their work appears in journals such as Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, The Astronomical Journal, Clinical Radiology, British Journal of Radiology and Journal of Theoretical Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact