Michael Bremer

59 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Michael Bremer
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Cancer Research 293
  • Otorhinolaryngology 80
  • Genetics 182
  • Genetics 348
  • Oncology 338
Replace Winfried Alberti with:
Winfried Alberti Germany
Leon Harisiadis United States
Noriaki Wada Japan
Mary Falzon United Kingdom
Noriyasu Usami Japan
Pilar España Spain
Luc Bron Switzerland
W. Michael Hogan United States
Jee Ye Kim South Korea
Pradip Amin United States
Michael Bremer relative to Winfried Alberti Germany Winfried Alberti's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.5×
Winfried Alberti · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Bremer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Bremer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Bremer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Bremer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Bremer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Bremer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Bremer. The network helps show where Michael Bremer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Bremer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Bremer Line = papers co-authored together Michael Bremer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007110
2 200573
3 200470
4 200268
5 200349
6 200947
7 200343
8 201042
9 201242
10 201241
11 200741
12 197939
13 201531
14 201431
15
Current status of selenium and other treatments for secondary lymphedema.
200630
16 200728
17 200228
18 200428
19 201427
20 200625

About Michael Bremer

Michael Bremer is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Molecular Biology, Genetics and Oncology, having authored 59 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include DNA Repair Mechanisms (14 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (13 papers), Brain Metastases and Treatment (11 papers), Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (9 papers), Management of metastatic bone disease (9 papers), Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (7 papers), Meningioma and schwannoma management (5 papers) and Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (293 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (80 citations), Genetics (182 citations), Genetics (348 citations) and Oncology (338 citations). Michael Bremer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Belarus and United States. Frequent co-authors include Johann H. Karstens, Thilo Dörk, Andreas Meyer, Natalia Bogdanova, Diana Steinmann, Christof Sohn, Hans Christiansen, Peter Hillemanns, Frank Bruns and Yuriy Rogov. Their work appears in journals such as Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, Radiotherapy and Oncology, Radiation Oncology, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics and BMC Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact