James K. Doyle

12 papers receiving 692 citations

Peers

James K. Doyle
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Management Science and Operations Research 272
  • General Decision Sciences 27
  • Speech and Hearing 53
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 31
  • Artificial Intelligence 209
Replace Tripp Shealy with:
Tripp Shealy United States
Alfonso Luis Palmer Pol Spain
Scott Peterson United States
Marco te Brömmelstroet Netherlands
Fred Woudenberg Netherlands
Phillip L. Morgan United Kingdom
Katherine Hamilton United States
Björn Lantz Sweden
Indira Nair United States
Nicole Huijts Netherlands
James K. Doyle relative to Tripp Shealy United States Tripp Shealy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.7×
Tripp Shealy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James K. Doyle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James K. Doyle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James K. Doyle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James K. Doyle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James K. Doyle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James K. Doyle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James K. Doyle. The network helps show where James K. Doyle may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside James K. Doyle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James K. Doyle Line = papers co-authored together James K. Doyle links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 1998309
2 2021151
3 199973
4 199772
5 199238
6 199734
7 199125
8 199121
9
Measuring Change in Mental Models of Dynamic Systems: An Exploratory Study
199814
10 200913
11 20205
12
Using Cognitive Styles Typology to Explain Individual Differences in Dynamic Decision Making: Much Ado about Nothing
19985

About James K. Doyle

James K. Doyle is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Artificial Intelligence, Sociology and Political Science, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 760 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cognitive Science and Mapping (5 papers), Complex Systems and Decision Making (5 papers), Risk Perception and Management (3 papers), Radioactive contamination and transfer (2 papers), Radioactivity and Radon Measurements (2 papers), Color perception and design (1 paper), Urban Green Space and Health (1 paper) and Housing Market and Economics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (272 citations), General Decision Sciences (27 citations), Speech and Hearing (53 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (31 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (209 citations). James K. Doyle has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Norway and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include David N. Ford, Peter A. Hancock, Chao Wang, Fan Zhang, Julian Wang, Shichao Liu, Cheuk Ming Mak, Gary H. McClelland, William D. Schulze and Jeffrey K. Lazo. Their work appears in journals such as System Dynamics Review, Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Journal of Applied Social Psychology and Building and Environment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact