James Hazel
Impact in
- Health Informatics top 10%
-
- Ethics in Clinical Research
Papers in
-
- Ethics in Clinical Research 8
-
- Law, AI, and Intellectual Property 7
- Co-authors
- Ellen Wright Clayton (7 shared papers)Mark A. Rothstein (3 shared papers)Barbara J. Evans (2 shared papers)Bradley Malin (5 shared papers)Zhiyu Wan (2 shared papers)Yevgeniy Vorobeychik (2 shared papers)Murat Kantarcıoğlu (2 shared papers)Christopher Slobogin (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Law and the Biosciences (3 papers)The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics (2 papers)Nature Reviews Genetics (2 papers)Duke Law Journal (1 paper)PLoS ONE (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNew ZealandJapan
In The Last Decade
James Hazel
15 papers receiving 335 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Health Informatics 14
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 126
- Genetics 114
- Reproductive Medicine 19
- Artificial Intelligence 82
Countries citing papers authored by James Hazel
This map shows the geographic impact of James Hazel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Hazel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Hazel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Hazel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Hazel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Hazel. The network helps show where James Hazel may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Hazel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 142 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 88 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 24 | |
| 4 | Public Attitudes Toward Direct to Consumer Genetic Testing. | 2019 | 23 |
| 5 | 2021 | 16 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 16 | |
| 7 | Who Knows What, and When?: A Survey of the Privacy Policies Proffered by U.S. Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Companies. | 2019 | 13 |
| 8 | 2020 | 7 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 5 | |
| 10 | A World of Difference? Law Enforcement, Genetic Data, and the Fourth Amendment | 2021 | 3 |
| 11 | 2019 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2019 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2022 | 2 |
About James Hazel
James Hazel is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Artificial Intelligence, Physiology, Political Science and International Relations and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 15 papers that have together received 350 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in Clinical Research (8 papers), Law, AI, and Intellectual Property (7 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (5 papers), Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (4 papers), Intellectual Property and Patents (2 papers), Law, Rights, and Freedoms (2 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers) and Circadian rhythm and melatonin (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (14 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (126 citations), Genetics (114 citations), Reproductive Medicine (19 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (82 citations). James Hazel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Ellen Wright Clayton, Mark A. Rothstein, Barbara J. Evans, Bradley Malin, Zhiyu Wan, Yevgeniy Vorobeychik, Murat Kantarcıoğlu, Christopher Slobogin, Laura M. Beskow and Catherine M. Hammack‐Aviran. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Law and the Biosciences, The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics, Nature Reviews Genetics, Duke Law Journal and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.