James Goodwin

574 citations
8 papers · 286 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

James Goodwin

7 papers receiving 274 citations

Peers

James Goodwin
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 170
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 28
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 17
  • Applied Psychology 11
  • Health 17
Replace Briain W.J. O’Hartaigh with:
Briain W.J. O’Hartaigh United States
Cristina Franzelli Italy
Issei Shiotani Japan
Daniel König Austria
Gabriela M. Hecht United States
Faris Al-Khalili Sweden
K Resser United States
Yuting Duan China
Joanna Sweeting Australia
Daniele Chirico Canada
James Goodwin relative to Briain W.J. O’Hartaigh United States Briain W.J. O’Hartaigh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Briain W.J. O’Hartaigh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Goodwin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Goodwin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Goodwin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Goodwin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Goodwin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Goodwin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Goodwin. The network helps show where James Goodwin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside James Goodwin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Goodwin Line = papers co-authored together James Goodwin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 2007113
2 200483
3 199339
4 201829
5
The therapeutics of placebo.
198018
6
A case of hyperthyroidism presenting as recurrent pneumonia.
19852
7 20071
8 20121

About James Goodwin

James Goodwin is a scholar working on Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiation, Cognitive Neuroscience and Epidemiology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 286 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (2 papers), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (2 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (2 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (1 paper), Thyroid Disorders and Treatments (1 paper), Mental Health and Psychiatry (1 paper), Empathy and Medical Education (1 paper) and Management of metastatic bone disease (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (170 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (28 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (17 citations), Applied Psychology (11 citations) and Health (17 citations). James Goodwin has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Paul Finn, Mary Bilous, Stephen C. Jones, Brian J. Kirby, Rod S Taylor, Jean Goodwin, Lynne Fairobent, Dustin A. Gress, Melissa Martin and H. James Wallace. Their work appears in journals such as Blood Pressure Monitoring, Canadian Medical Association Journal, Journal of Hypertension, Critical Reviews in Eukaryotic Gene Expression and Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact