Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics

52.1k citations
4.3k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

  • Radiation top 0.5%
    • Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
    • Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies
    • Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
    • Radiation Dose and Imaging
    • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging

Papers in

    • Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques 2.9k
    • Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies 171
    • Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications 925
    • Radiation Dose and Imaging 827
    • Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy 142

Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics

3.6k papers receiving 47.8k citations

Peers

Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
Comparison fields: 5 of 205
  • Radiation 33.2k
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 19.1k
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 17.4k
  • Biomedical Engineering 8.0k
  • Otorhinolaryngology 645
Replace Physica Medica with:
Physica Medica Italy
Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment China
Radiation Oncology Germany
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie Germany
Clinical Oncology United Kingdom
Acta Oncologica Sweden
Nuclear Medicine Communications United States
Investigative Radiology United States
Annals of Nuclear Medicine Japan
Journal of Thoracic Oncology United States
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics relative to Physica Medica Italy Physica Medica's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Physica Medica · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics.

About Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics

The 4.3k papers published in Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics in the last decades have received a total of 52.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics usually cover Radiation (2.9k papers), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (1.9k papers), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (1.5k papers), Biomedical Engineering (734 papers) and Otorhinolaryngology (49 papers) specifically the topics of Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (2.9k papers), Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry (1.2k papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (925 papers), Radiation Dose and Imaging (827 papers), Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (644 papers), Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies (171 papers), Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (157 papers) and Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy (142 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics are James B. Smathers, Timothy D. Solberg, G Mageras, Stephen F. Kry, D Followill, Benjamin E. Nelms, Vladimir Feygelman, Gary A. Ezzell, Geoffrey Zhang and Peter Balter.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact