James Foreit

18 papers receiving 256 citations

Peers

James Foreit
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 91
  • General Health Professions 107
  • General Decision Sciences 7
  • Gender Studies 19
  • Emergency Medical Services 12
Replace S. Vere Pearson with:
S. Vere Pearson United Kingdom
Pranita Achyut United States
Amy Reid United States
Kathryn O’Neill Switzerland
Jeroen van Ginneken Netherlands
Alison Hernández Sweden
Joyce E. Thompson United States
Kelly Durrant Australia
Alfred Agwanda Kenya
Rose Laisser Tanzania
James Foreit relative to S. Vere Pearson United Kingdom S. Vere Pearson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
S. Vere Pearson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Foreit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Foreit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Foreit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Foreit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Foreit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Foreit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Foreit. The network helps show where James Foreit may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside James Foreit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Foreit Line = papers co-authored together James Foreit links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 199989
2 200241
3 197836
4 198121
5 201117
6 199317
7 199815
8 198413
9 199911
10 19929
11 19985
12 19823
13
The transition in Korean family planning behavior, 1935-1976: a retrospective cohort analysis.
19822
14 20012
15
The mass media and health beliefs: using media campaigns to promote preventive behavior.
19932
16
An experiment in Callao Peru to protect high risk women from AIDS and other STDs.
19881
17 19901
18
Willingness to pay for well-family midwife services in the Philippines.
20011
19 20130

About James Foreit

James Foreit is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, Gender Studies and Social Psychology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 286 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Maternal and Child Health (8 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (5 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (4 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (2 papers), Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (2 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (2 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (1 paper) and Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (91 citations), General Health Professions (107 citations), General Decision Sciences (7 citations), Gender Studies (19 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (12 citations). James Foreit has collaborated with scholars based in United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Karen G. Foreit, John Bratt, Barbara Janowitz, Sarah Raifman, Tomáš Frejka, Ricardo Vernon, Jorge Alarcón, F. Stephen Wignall and James E. Rosen. Their work appears in journals such as Studies in Family Planning, Health Policy, Health Policy and Planning, Population and Environment and Social Marketing Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact