James Everett

2.3k citations
68 papers · 1.8k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

James Everett

60 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

James Everett
Comparison fields: 5 of 165
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 357
  • Neurology 137
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 223
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 236
  • Physiology 290
Replace Richard Miller with:
Richard Miller United States
Yan Zhou China
George D. Mellick Australia
John S. Penn United States
Michael J. Devine United Kingdom
William R. Woodward United States
David J. Combs United States
Yoshitomo Takahashi Japan
Irina Abakumova Russia
Eun‐Mee Kim South Korea
James Everett relative to Richard Miller United States Richard Miller's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Richard Miller · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Everett

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Everett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Everett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Everett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Everett

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Everett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Everett. The network helps show where James Everett may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Everett, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Everett Line = papers co-authored together James Everett links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 68 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017138
2 2014122
3 1953103
4 2018101
5
Performance of patients with schizophrenia on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST).
200198
6 199285
7 198578
8 202168
9 198964
10 199760
11 200356
12 199056
13 198555
14 201453
15 201951
16 198649
17 199648
18 202043
19 197638
20 197229

About James Everett

James Everett is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, Nutrition and Dietetics, Physiology and Social Psychology, having authored 68 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Trace Elements in Health (11 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (8 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (8 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (8 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (7 papers), Public Relations and Crisis Communication (6 papers), Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (5 papers) and Management and Organizational Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (357 citations), Neurology (137 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (223 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (236 citations) and Physiology (290 citations). James Everett has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Neil D. Telling, Joanna F. Collingwood, Louis Laplante, Jon Dobson, W. C. J. Ross, Alain Morin, Jake Brooks, J. J. Roberts, G. van der Laan and Frederik Lermyte. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, Public Relations Review, Experimental Brain Research, Science Advances and European Psychologist.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact