James E. Vance

2.5k citations
62 papers · 2.0k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

James E. Vance

58 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

James E. Vance
Comparison fields: 5 of 156
  • Urban Studies 410
  • Transportation 194
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 245
  • Building and Construction 225
  • Economics and Econometrics 392
Replace Cecilia Wong with:
Cecilia Wong United Kingdom
J. Brian McLoughlin United Kingdom
Kathryn Davidson Australia
Scott Hawken Australia
Matthew W. Wilson United States
Alessandro Balducci Italy
Jean Dubé Canada
Paulo Pinho Portugal
Charles C. Harris United States
Stefano Moroni Italy
James E. Vance relative to Cecilia Wong United Kingdom Cecilia Wong's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.8×
Cecilia Wong · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James E. Vance

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James E. Vance's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. Vance with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. Vance more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James E. Vance

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. Vance. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. Vance. The network helps show where James E. Vance may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James E. Vance, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James E. Vance Line = papers co-authored together James E. Vance links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 62 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1958247
2 1982247
3 1971139
4 1954112
5 197283
6 199273
7 196857
8 196857
9 196956
10 199054
11 197850
12
Nesidioblastosis in familial endocrine adenomatosis.
196949
13 196643
14 195543
15 197142
16 196938
17 197238
18 196737
19 196637
20 196935

About James E. Vance

James E. Vance is a scholar working on Surgery, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Molecular Biology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and Epidemiology, having authored 62 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pancreatic function and diabetes (8 papers), American Environmental and Regional History (7 papers), Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances (6 papers), Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer (5 papers), Urbanization and City Planning (3 papers), Diet, Metabolism, and Disease (3 papers), Regional Economic and Spatial Analysis (2 papers) and Diabetes Treatment and Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (410 citations), Transportation (194 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (245 citations), Building and Construction (225 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (392 citations). James E. Vance has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include F. Stuart Chapin, Robert H. Williams, K. D. Buchanan, Raymond E. Murphy, Dennis G. Hay, Peter Hall, Arthur Getis, Emrys Jones, R Stoll and Abbas E. Kitabchi. Their work appears in journals such as Economic Geography, Geographical Review, Diabetes, Metabolism and Geographical Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact