James E. Lucas
Impact in
-
- CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
- RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
- Protein Structure and Dynamics
- RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
Papers in
-
- Protein Structure and Dynamics 2
- Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques 1
- Protein purification and stability 1
- RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms 1
-
- Enzyme Structure and Function 2
- Co-authors
- Tanja Kortemme (3 shared papers)Shane Ó Conchúir (1 shared paper)Kyle A. Barlow (1 shared paper)Samuel Thompson (1 shared paper)Pooja Suresh (1 shared paper)Markus Heinonen (1 shared paper)Christof Fellmann (1 shared paper)Benjamin M. Heineike (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Electrophoresis (1 paper)PLoS Computational Biology (1 paper)Nature Communications (1 paper)ACS Synthetic Biology (1 paper)Protein Science (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwitzerlandFinland
In The Last Decade
James E. Lucas
8 papers receiving 344 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Business and International Management 10
- Molecular Biology 304
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 36
- Biotechnology 15
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 35
Countries citing papers authored by James E. Lucas
This map shows the geographic impact of James E. Lucas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. Lucas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. Lucas more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James E. Lucas
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. Lucas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. Lucas. The network helps show where James E. Lucas may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 24 scholars most cited alongside James E. Lucas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 158 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 147 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 21 | |
| 4 | 1990 | 9 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 5 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 5 | |
| 7 | 1982 | 3 | |
| 8 | Implications of an Enzymatic Biosensor for the Detection of Rancid Olive Oil | 2014 | 1 |
About James E. Lucas
James E. Lucas is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Materials Chemistry, Organic Chemistry, Genetics and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, having authored 8 papers that have together received 349 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Enzyme Structure and Function (2 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (2 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (1 paper), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (1 paper), Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders (1 paper), Protein purification and stability (1 paper), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (1 paper) and Edible Oils Quality and Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Business and International Management (10 citations), Molecular Biology (304 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (36 citations), Biotechnology (15 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (35 citations). James E. Lucas has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Tanja Kortemme, Shane Ó Conchúir, Kyle A. Barlow, Samuel Thompson, Pooja Suresh, Markus Heinonen, Christof Fellmann, Benjamin M. Heineike, Kyle E. Watters and Jennifer A. Doudna. Their work appears in journals such as Electrophoresis, PLoS Computational Biology, Nature Communications, ACS Synthetic Biology and Protein Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.