James E. Glazer

625 citations
18 papers · 379 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

James E. Glazer

17 papers receiving 372 citations

Peers

James E. Glazer
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • General Decision Sciences 26
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 252
  • Applied Psychology 45
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 112
  • Clinical Psychology 90
Replace Anna Thorwart with:
Anna Thorwart Germany
Erdem Pulcu United Kingdom
Keisha Novak United States
Susan Bamford United Kingdom
A. Hunter Threadgill United States
Tricia X. F. Seow Ireland
Frederik M. van der Veen Netherlands
Kristine M. McGlennen United States
Daniel Wiswede Germany
Davide Francesco Stramaccia Italy
James E. Glazer relative to Anna Thorwart Germany Anna Thorwart's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Anna Thorwart · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James E. Glazer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James E. Glazer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. Glazer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. Glazer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James E. Glazer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. Glazer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. Glazer. The network helps show where James E. Glazer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James E. Glazer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James E. Glazer Line = papers co-authored together James E. Glazer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2018220
2 201836
3 202229
4 201520
5 202014
6 20188
7 20218
8 20197
9 20226
10 20236
11 20196
12 20166
13 20225
14 20233
15 20242
16 20232
17 20241
18 20250

About James E. Glazer

James E. Glazer is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology and Applied Psychology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 379 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (11 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (5 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (4 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (3 papers), Psychedelics and Drug Studies (2 papers) and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (26 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (252 citations), Applied Psychology (45 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (112 citations) and Clinical Psychology (90 citations). James E. Glazer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Czechia and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Robin Nusslock, Nicholas J. Kelley, Narun Pornpattananangkul, Vijay A. Mittal, Shinobu Kitayama, Royce Lee, Harriet de Wit, Conor H. Murray, Hidefumi Hitokoto and Israel Liberzon. Their work appears in journals such as Psychophysiology, Biological Psychology, Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, Psychopharmacology and International Journal of Psychophysiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact