James E. Feng

2.1k citations
75 papers · 1.3k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

James E. Feng

70 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

James E. Feng
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 88
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 109
  • Surgery 631
  • Social Psychology 267
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 132
Replace Jennifer M. Wright with:
Jennifer M. Wright United States
Jonathan Huang United States
Takashi Maruyama Japan
Thomas F. Flood United States
A Turner Australia
Megan Gray United States
John A. Foss United States
Michael L. Lee United States
M. Lambertz Germany
Kian Y. Ho Australia
James E. Feng relative to Jennifer M. Wright United States Jennifer M. Wright's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.4×
Jennifer M. Wright · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James E. Feng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James E. Feng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. Feng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. Feng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James E. Feng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. Feng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. Feng. The network helps show where James E. Feng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James E. Feng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James E. Feng Line = papers co-authored together James E. Feng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 75 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017193
2 2016131
3 2018111
4 201992
5 201978
6 202074
7 201846
8 201830
9 202128
10 201928
11 201927
12 202025
13 201822
14 202020
15 202020
16 202118
17 201817
18 201917
19 201817
20 201916

About James E. Feng

James E. Feng is a scholar working on Surgery, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Social Psychology and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, having authored 75 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (26 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (18 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (9 papers), Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (6 papers), Hip and Femur Fractures (4 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (3 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (3 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (88 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (109 citations), Surgery (631 citations), Social Psychology (267 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (132 citations). James E. Feng has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Ran Schwarzkopf, Afshin A. Anoushiravani, David Novikov, Dayu Lin, William J. Long, James Slover, Jonathan M. Vigdorchik, Morteza Meftah, Yoshiko Hashikawa and Jiaxing Zhang. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Arthroplasty, The Bone & Joint Journal, Arthroplasty Today, JBJS Reviews and Orthopedics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact