Countries where authors publish in The Bone & Joint Journal
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Bone & Joint Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Bone & Joint Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Bone & Joint Journal more than expected).
Fields of papers published in The Bone & Joint Journal
This network shows the impact of papers published in The Bone & Joint Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Bone & Joint Journal.
About The Bone & Joint Journal
The 3.4k papers published in The Bone & Joint Journal in the last decades have received a total of 97.3k indexed citations . Papers published in The Bone & Joint Journal usually cover Surgery (2.4k papers), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (259 papers), Rehabilitation (97 papers), Rheumatology (167 papers) and Internal Medicine (33 papers) specifically the topics of Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (715 papers), Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (577 papers), Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (267 papers), Bone fractures and treatments (238 papers), Shoulder Injury and Treatment (197 papers), Hip disorders and treatments (192 papers), Foot and Ankle Surgery (186 papers) and Hip and Femur Fractures (158 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Bone & Joint Journal are Fares Sami Haddad, Javad Parvizi, Matthew P. Abdel, Thorsten A. Gehrke, Nick D. Clement, Sujith Konan, David W. Murray, Matthew Lee Costa, Hemant G. Pandit and Clivе P. Duncan.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.