James E. Crisson

2k citations
19 papers · 1.7k · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

James E. Crisson

18 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

James E. Crisson
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Pharmacology 929
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 258
  • Applied Psychology 75
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 164
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 176
Replace Dominique Dion with:
Dominique Dion Canada
Lawrence S. Schoenfeld United States
Hampton J. Atkinson United States
Lauren C. Heathcote United States
Randy S. Roth United States
Cindy D. Scipio United States
Renée Steele Rosomoff United States
Richard T. Gross United States
Mark A. Slater United States
Gabriel Tan United States
James E. Crisson relative to Dominique Dion Canada Dominique Dion's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Dominique Dion · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James E. Crisson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James E. Crisson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. Crisson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. Crisson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James E. Crisson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. Crisson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. Crisson. The network helps show where James E. Crisson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside James E. Crisson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James E. Crisson Line = papers co-authored together James E. Crisson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 1987285
2 1990276
3 1988196
4 1987154
5 1990143
6 1986142
7 1987113
8 198796
9 199065
10 198644
11 198938
12 198536
13 198630
14
Observational methods for assessing pain: A practical guide.
198730
15 198917
16 198612
17 19889
18 19954
19 19881

About James E. Crisson

James E. Crisson is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Dermatology and Applied Psychology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (11 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (3 papers), Dermatology and Skin Diseases (2 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (1 paper), Communication in Education and Healthcare (1 paper) and Sport Psychology and Performance (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (929 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (258 citations), Applied Psychology (75 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (164 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (176 citations). James E. Crisson has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Francis J. Keefe, Karen M. Gil, David S. Caldwell, David Arnold Williams, Kate T. Queen, Salutario Martinez, Bruno J. Urban, et al, Wesley A. Cook and Lawrence H. Muhlbaier. Their work appears in journals such as Pain, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Basic and Applied Social Psychology, Journal of Psychosomatic Research and Behavior Therapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact