John J. Seta

67 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

John J. Seta
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • General Decision Sciences 565
  • Applied Psychology 125
  • Social Psychology 396
  • Marketing 129
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 235
Replace Amy L. Summerville with:
Amy L. Summerville United States
Tal Eyal Israel
Lien B. Pham United States
Faith Gleicher United States
David F. Lopez United States
Johanna Peetz Canada
Ana Guinote United Kingdom
Keith D. Markman United States
Matthew N. McMullen United States
Martin F. Davies United Kingdom
John J. Seta relative to Amy L. Summerville United States Amy L. Summerville's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Amy L. Summerville · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John J. Seta

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John J. Seta's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John J. Seta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John J. Seta more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John J. Seta

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John J. Seta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John J. Seta. The network helps show where John J. Seta may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside John J. Seta, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John J. Seta Line = papers co-authored together John J. Seta links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1990409
2 1982154
3 2003153
4 197681
5 199654
6
To do or not to do: desirability and consistency mediate judgements of regret.
200150
7 200150
8 199148
9 197644
10 200443
11 200640
12 198938
13 198036
14 198231
15 199231
16 199227
17 198326
18 199322
19 200722
20 197919

About John J. Seta

John J. Seta is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 69 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (29 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (29 papers), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (8 papers), Sport Psychology and Performance (8 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (8 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (6 papers), Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience (6 papers) and Team Dynamics and Performance (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (565 citations), Applied Psychology (125 citations), Social Psychology (396 citations), Marketing (129 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (235 citations). John J. Seta has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Catherine E. Seta, Todd McElroy, Leonard L. Martin, Paul B. Paulus, Janette K. Schkade, Michael McCormick, John V. Petrocelli, Robert Matthews, James E. Crisson and Hall P. Beck. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Basic and Applied Social Psychology, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology and Journal of Behavioral Decision Making.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact