John J. Seta

80 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

John J. Seta
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • General Decision Sciences 427
  • Applied Psychology 522
  • Social Psychology 771
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 247
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 359
Replace Kenneth Savitsky with:
Kenneth Savitsky United States
Erik P. Thompson United States
Kari Edwards United States
Lien B. Pham United States
Faith Gleicher United States
Keith D. Markman United States
Scott Spiegel United States
Roman Trötschel Germany
Christopher J. R. Roney Canada
Annette Y. Lee-Chai United States
John J. Seta relative to Kenneth Savitsky United States Kenneth Savitsky's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Kenneth Savitsky · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John J. Seta

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John J. Seta's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John J. Seta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John J. Seta more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John J. Seta

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John J. Seta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John J. Seta. The network helps show where John J. Seta may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside John J. Seta, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John J. Seta Line = papers co-authored together John J. Seta links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 81 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1990354
2 2003156
3 1982147
4 197678
5
To do or not to do: desirability and consistency mediate judgements of regret.
200154
6 200151
7 199148
8 199645
9 200442
10 197640
11 199640
12 200638
13 198033
14 198932
15 198929
16 199229
17 199228
18 198227
19 199323
20 200723

About John J. Seta

John J. Seta is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Applied Psychology, General Decision Sciences and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 81 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (30 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (26 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (25 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (18 papers), Psychology of Social Influence (7 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (6 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (6 papers) and Media Influence and Health (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (427 citations), Applied Psychology (522 citations), Social Psychology (771 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (247 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (359 citations). John J. Seta has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Catherine E. Seta, Todd McElroy, Leonard L. Martin, Paul B. Paulus, Janette K. Schkade, Michael McCormick, James E. Crisson, John V. Petrocelli, Robert Matthews and Hall P. Beck. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Basic and Applied Social Psychology, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology and Journal of Behavioral Decision Making.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact