James E. Carroll

4.8k citations
107 papers · 3.8k · h-index 33

Impact in

Papers in

James E. Carroll

107 papers receiving 3.6k citations

Peers

James E. Carroll
Comparison fields: 5 of 145
  • Developmental Neuroscience 453
  • Genetics 784
  • Neurology 525
  • Clinical Biochemistry 338
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 507
Replace Yutaka Oiso with:
Yutaka Oiso Japan
Masakiyo Sasahara Japan
Barry W. Festoff United States
Akihiko Taguchi Japan
Jörgen Isgaard Sweden
Javad Towfighi United States
Keith R. Pennypacker United States
Martin H. Maurer Germany
Maria Svelto Italy
Nicholas J. Laping United States
James E. Carroll relative to Yutaka Oiso Japan Yutaka Oiso's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Yutaka Oiso · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James E. Carroll

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James E. Carroll's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. Carroll with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. Carroll more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James E. Carroll

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. Carroll. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. Carroll. The network helps show where James E. Carroll may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James E. Carroll, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James E. Carroll Line = papers co-authored together James E. Carroll links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 107 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004339
2 2002223
3 1984161
4 1982160
5 1979144
6 2004143
7 1986129
8 2005122
9
Detection of new paternal dystrophin gene mutations in isolated cases of dystrophinopathy in females.
1994119
10 1979112
11 200893
12 199875
13 199475
14 200670
15 199861
16 197757
17 197651
18 198850
19 200550
20 198550

About James E. Carroll

James E. Carroll is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics, Clinical Biochemistry, Physiology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 107 papers that have together received 3.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (22 papers), Mesenchymal stem cell research (16 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (12 papers), Muscle metabolism and nutrition (12 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (9 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (9 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (8 papers) and Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (453 citations), Genetics (784 citations), Neurology (525 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (338 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (507 citations). James E. Carroll has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Kuwait and Canada. Frequent co-authors include David C. Hess, Michael H. Brooke, Angeline Martin-Studdard, William Hill, Jack B. Shumate, Cesar V. Borlongan, Charles Cheng, James M. Hagberg, Robert W. Mays and William G. Totty. Their work appears in journals such as Neurology, Muscle & Nerve, Journal of Child Neurology, Stroke and The Journal of Pediatrics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact