James Coker
Impact in
- Biotechnology top 10%
- Enzyme Production and Characterization
- Ecology top 10%
- Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
Papers in
-
- Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies 4
- Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization 2
-
- Enzyme Structure and Function 3
- Co-authors
- Shiladitya DasSarma (8 shared papers)Priya DasSarma (6 shared papers)Giancarlo Galli (1 shared paper)Jochen A. Müller (3 shared papers)Jean E. Brenchley (2 shared papers)Peter P. Sheridan (1 shared paper)Kevin R. Gutshall (1 shared paper)Ann J. Auman (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Bacteriology (2 papers)BMC Genetics (1 paper)Applied Physics Letters (1 paper)Journal of the Optical Society of America B (1 paper)Physical Review A (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChinaAustralia
In The Last Decade
James Coker
25 papers receiving 576 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Biotechnology 77
- Ecology 182
- Molecular Biology 286
- Environmental Chemistry 39
- Condensed Matter Physics 37
Countries citing papers authored by James Coker
This map shows the geographic impact of James Coker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Coker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Coker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Coker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Coker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Coker. The network helps show where James Coker may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Coker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 74 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 71 | |
| 3 | 1970 | 70 | |
| 4 | 2006 | 57 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 47 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 44 | |
| 7 | 2006 | 42 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 31 | |
| 9 | 1974 | 25 | |
| 10 | 2009 | 23 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 21 | |
| 12 | 1975 | 21 | |
| 13 | 2006 | 20 | |
| 14 | 1969 | 9 | |
| 15 | 2000 | 8 | |
| 16 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 17 | 2011 | 6 | |
| 18 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2013 | 3 | |
| 20 | 2013 | 3 |
About James Coker
James Coker is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Materials Chemistry, Ecology, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 26 papers that have together received 591 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (6 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (4 papers), Enzyme Structure and Function (3 papers), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (3 papers), Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization (2 papers), Algorithms and Data Compression (2 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (2 papers) and Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biotechnology (77 citations), Ecology (182 citations), Molecular Biology (286 citations), Environmental Chemistry (39 citations) and Condensed Matter Physics (37 citations). James Coker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Shiladitya DasSarma, Priya DasSarma, Giancarlo Galli, Jochen A. Müller, Jean E. Brenchley, Peter P. Sheridan, Kevin R. Gutshall, Ann J. Auman, F. A. Pizzarello and Brian R. Berquist. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Bacteriology, BMC Genetics, Applied Physics Letters, Journal of the Optical Society of America B and Physical Review A.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.