James Cnota

87 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

James Cnota
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Epidemiology 915
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 485
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 162
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 267
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 182
Replace Nurdan Uraş with:
Nurdan Uraş Türkiye
Mehmet Yekta Öncel Türkiye
Tsu‐Fuh Yeh Taiwan
Marci K. Sontag United States
Eli Maymon Israel
Victor Herson United States
Bernhard Resch Austria
Maria Katarzyna Borszewska-Kornacka Poland
Elisabeth M. W. Kooi Netherlands
Nicolaas J. G. Jansen Netherlands
James Cnota relative to Nurdan Uraş Türkiye Nurdan Uraş's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Nurdan Uraş · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Cnota

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Cnota's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Cnota with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Cnota more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Cnota

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Cnota. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Cnota. The network helps show where James Cnota may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Cnota, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Cnota Line = papers co-authored together James Cnota links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 93 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005441
2 2010315
3 2012111
4 201599
5 201069
6 201867
7 202057
8 201157
9 200348
10 201047
11 201145
12 201444
13 201540
14 201139
15 201033
16 201632
17 202031
18 201330
19 201330
20 201529

About James Cnota

James Cnota is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 93 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Congenital Heart Disease Studies (41 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (9 papers), Cardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy (5 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (5 papers), Coronary Artery Anomalies (4 papers), Congenital heart defects research (3 papers), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (3 papers) and Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Epidemiology (915 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (485 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (162 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (267 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (182 citations). James Cnota has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Tunisia. Frequent co-authors include Kelly Rouster‐Stevens, Michael L. Cannon, Michael H. Land, Avinash K. Shetty, Charles R. Woods, Erik Michelfelder, Allison Divanović, Helen Jones, William Gottliebson and Kan N. Hor. Their work appears in journals such as Congenital Heart Disease, Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, PEDIATRICS, Circulation and Pediatric Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact