William Polzin

2.1k citations
49 papers · 1.2k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

William Polzin

47 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

William Polzin
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 252
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 586
  • Surgery 268
  • Urology 30
  • Epidemiology 133
Replace Özgür Deren with:
Özgür Deren Türkiye
U. Germer Germany
Kasemsri Srisupundit Thailand
Monica Mihaela Cîrstoiu Romania
L. Orsini Italy
B. Puerto Spain
K. S. Heling Germany
B S Mahony United States
Simon Meagher Australia
B. Messing Israel
William Polzin relative to Özgür Deren Türkiye Özgür Deren's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Özgür Deren · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Polzin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Polzin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Polzin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Polzin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Polzin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Polzin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Polzin. The network helps show where William Polzin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Polzin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Polzin Line = papers co-authored together William Polzin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009113
2 2007112
3 201599
4 200971
5
The association of antiphospholipid antibodies with pregnancies complicated by fetal growth restriction.
199161
6 200758
7 200852
8 200252
9 199247
10 201145
11 199834
12 200931
13 200928
14 201427
15 200925
16 201723
17 201223
18 201023
19 200723
20 201619

About William Polzin

William Polzin is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Epidemiology, having authored 49 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (19 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (13 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (5 papers), Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis (4 papers), Tracheal and airway disorders (4 papers), Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies (4 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (4 papers) and Gestational Trophoblastic Disease Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (252 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (586 citations), Surgery (268 citations), Urology (30 citations) and Epidemiology (133 citations). William Polzin has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Timothy M. Crombleholme, Foong‐Yen Lim, Mounira Habli, Kim Brady, Erik Michelfelder, Jeffrey Livingston, Kristin Coppage, John A. Read, Jerome Kopelman and David Lewis. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy, Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology and Journal of Pediatric Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact