James C. Kim

14 papers receiving 630 citations

Peers

James C. Kim
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Genetics 120
  • Cancer Research 89
  • Animal Science and Zoology 53
  • Molecular Biology 324
  • Urology 25
Replace Maher Kharrat with:
Maher Kharrat Tunisia
Nicholas C. Hsu Taiwan
Jie Man Netherlands
Melissa S. DeRycke United States
K. Wyatt McMahon United States
Yuanying Gong China
Itsaso Mauleón Spain
Jennifer Totonchy United States
Shida Zhu China
Morris Laster Israel
James C. Kim relative to Maher Kharrat Tunisia Maher Kharrat's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.1×
Maher Kharrat · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James C. Kim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James C. Kim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James C. Kim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James C. Kim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James C. Kim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James C. Kim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James C. Kim. The network helps show where James C. Kim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James C. Kim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James C. Kim Line = papers co-authored together James C. Kim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2007225
2 2014131
3 199583
4 201751
5 200041
6 200140
7 202120
8 201013
9 200112
10 20148
11 19956
12
Changes of Dietary Pattern, Food Choice, Food Consumption, Nutrient Intake and Body Mass Index of Korean American College Students with Different Length of Residence in the Los Angeles Areas.
20105
13 20012
14
A Comparison of Dietary Patterns and Nutrient Intakes between Korean American College Students and Their Respective Parents Living in the Same Household
20101
15
A Comparison of Dietary Intakes between Male and Female Korean American College Students: A Two Generation Study.
20120

About James C. Kim

James C. Kim is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Surgery, Nutrition and Dietetics, Genetics and Infectious Diseases, having authored 15 papers that have together received 638 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior (3 papers), Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer (2 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (2 papers), SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (2 papers), Animal Virus Infections Studies (2 papers), Virus-based gene therapy research (2 papers), Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments (2 papers) and Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (120 citations), Cancer Research (89 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (53 citations), Molecular Biology (324 citations) and Urology (25 citations). James C. Kim has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Gary D. Steinberg, A. John Iafrate, Glenn S. Gerber, Miguel N. Rivera, Mark R. Denison, Paul F. Currier, Xiaotao Lu, Brian W. Brannigan, Daphne W. Bell and Andrew P. Feinberg. Their work appears in journals such as Virology, Human Gene Therapy, Clinical Cancer Research, The Journal of Urology and European Journal of Medical Genetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact