James A. Ward

777 citations
67 papers · 397 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

James A. Ward

48 papers receiving 306 citations

Peers

James A. Ward
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
  • Internal Medicine 17
  • Management Information Systems 48
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 11
  • Health 25
  • Clinical Psychology 61
Replace Michael E. Stuart with:
Michael E. Stuart United States
Daniel Faria Portugal
David Douglas Australia
Gregory Brown United States
Stephen P. Smith United States
Eric Stone United States
Nancy E. Barr United States
David M. Neal United States
Angel Jannasch‐Pennell United States
Alison Cawsey United Kingdom
James A. Ward relative to Michael E. Stuart United States Michael E. Stuart's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Michael E. Stuart · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James A. Ward

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James A. Ward's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James A. Ward with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James A. Ward more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James A. Ward

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James A. Ward. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James A. Ward. The network helps show where James A. Ward may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James A. Ward, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James A. Ward Line = papers co-authored together James A. Ward links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197751
2 198429
3
Ambulatory venous pressure studies in postphlebitic and other disease states.
195129
4 199627
5 199420
6 199518
7 195718
8 196315
9 198814
10 200113
11 199712
12 198811
13 197910
14 19958
15 19688
16 19887
17 19946
18 19956
19 19945
20 19625

About James A. Ward

James A. Ward is a scholar working on Marketing, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Strategy and Management, Sociology and Political Science and Management Information Systems, having authored 67 papers that have together received 397 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American History and Culture (10 papers), American Environmental and Regional History (6 papers), Race, History, and American Society (4 papers), Transport and Economic Policies (2 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (2 papers), Big Data and Business Intelligence (2 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (2 papers) and Historical Art and Culture Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (17 citations), Management Information Systems (48 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (11 citations), Health (25 citations) and Clinical Psychology (61 citations). James A. Ward has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include J E Fox, Paul T. DeCamp, Alton Ochsner, Jim Salinger, Vincent P. Carosso, John Stover, John H. White, C. M. Campbell, E. F. Robertson and Maqbool Dada. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Journal of American History, Information Systems Management, The Journal of Southern History and Technology and Culture.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact