Jaime E. Heiss

750 citations
13 papers · 540 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Jaime E. Heiss

13 papers receiving 533 citations

Peers

Jaime E. Heiss
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 391
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 82
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 222
  • Sensory Systems 27
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 65
Replace Kiyomi Nakamura with:
Kiyomi Nakamura Japan
Tomoyasu Horikawa Japan
Janaina Pantoja United States
Changming Wang China
Michel Besserve Germany
Yuko Yotsumoto Japan
Kazutomo Yunokuchi Japan
Masako Tamaki Japan
Chunying Jia United States
Jaime E. Heiss relative to Kiyomi Nakamura Japan Kiyomi Nakamura's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Kiyomi Nakamura · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jaime E. Heiss

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jaime E. Heiss's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jaime E. Heiss with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jaime E. Heiss more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jaime E. Heiss

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jaime E. Heiss. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jaime E. Heiss. The network helps show where Jaime E. Heiss may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jaime E. Heiss, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jaime E. Heiss Line = papers co-authored together Jaime E. Heiss links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 201399
2 200897
3 200686
4 201664
5 200252
6 200642
7 200232
8 201227
9 201814
10 20159
11 20247
12 20167
13 20054

About Jaime E. Heiss

Jaime E. Heiss is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Pharmacy and Molecular Biology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 540 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (5 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (5 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (4 papers), Infant Health and Development (4 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (4 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (3 papers), Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research (2 papers) and Regulation of Appetite and Obesity (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (391 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (82 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (222 citations), Sensory Systems (27 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (65 citations). Jaime E. Heiss has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and Chile. Frequent co-authors include Ilan Lampl, Yonatan Katz, Thomas S. Kilduff, Elad Ganmor, Claes Held, P. A. Estévez, Lars Dittrich, Carlos A. Perez, Maryka Quik and Xiomara A. Perez. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, eNeuro, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering and Frontiers in Neural Circuits.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact