Jade Hooper

464 citations
12 papers · 279 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Jade Hooper

11 papers receiving 271 citations

Peers

Jade Hooper
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Public Administration 72
  • Safety Research 82
  • Clinical Psychology 131
  • General Health Professions 128
  • Health 19
Replace Janice Ikeda with:
Janice Ikeda Canada
Nina Esaki United States
Barry Luckock United Kingdom
Siobhan E. Laird United Kingdom
Nughmana Mirza United Kingdom
Rosamund Thorpe Australia
Jacquelyn McCroskey United States
Amy D. Benton United States
Ian Hyslop New Zealand
Claudia Bernard United Kingdom
Jade Hooper relative to Janice Ikeda Canada Janice Ikeda's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Janice Ikeda · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jade Hooper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jade Hooper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jade Hooper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jade Hooper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jade Hooper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jade Hooper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jade Hooper. The network helps show where Jade Hooper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Jade Hooper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jade Hooper Line = papers co-authored together Jade Hooper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2018121
2 201898
3 201617
4 201815
5 201911
6
Factors that influence choice of placement for community service among occupational therapists in South Africa
20145
7
Pathways to permanence for children who become looked after in Scotland
20195
8 20223
9
Identifying and understanding inequalities in child welfare intervention rates: quantitative evidence from a comparison of the four UK countries
20172
10 20181
11 20191
12 20170

About Jade Hooper

Jade Hooper is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science and Social Psychology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 279 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child Welfare and Adoption (5 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (4 papers), Child and Adolescent Health (3 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (2 papers), Community Health and Development (2 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (2 papers), Family Support in Illness (2 papers) and Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (72 citations), Safety Research (82 citations), Clinical Psychology (131 citations), General Health Professions (128 citations) and Health (19 citations). Jade Hooper has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ghana and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Lisa Bunting, Paul Bywaters, Jonathan Scourfield, Brigid Daniel, Claire McCartan, Martin Elliott, Kate Morris, Geraldine Brady, Will Mason and Nughmana Mirza. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal for Population Data Science, Social Policy and Society, Journal of Social Work, Journal of Mixed Methods Research and Child & Family Social Work.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact