Jacques Curély

1.1k citations
38 papers · 819 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Jacques Curély

37 papers receiving 781 citations

Peers

Jacques Curély
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 559
  • Inorganic Chemistry 284
  • Condensed Matter Physics 230
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 195
  • Oncology 145
Replace Simon G. Carling with:
Simon G. Carling United Kingdom
Yuzo Hashimoto Japan
Christopher J. Nuttall United Kingdom
A. Orendáčová Slovakia
Konstantin Pokhodnya United States
Leonard W. ter Haar United States
Y. Bodenthin Switzerland
W.J.A. Maaskant Netherlands
R.E.P. Winpenny United Kingdom
G. E. Shankle United States
Jacques Curély relative to Simon G. Carling United Kingdom Simon G. Carling's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Simon G. Carling · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jacques Curély

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jacques Curély's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jacques Curély with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jacques Curély more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jacques Curély

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jacques Curély. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jacques Curély. The network helps show where Jacques Curély may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jacques Curély, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jacques Curély Line = papers co-authored together Jacques Curély links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1994117
2 198878
3 198978
4 199458
5 199553
6 199541
7 200240
8 199835
9 199835
10 199831
11 198628
12 198627
13 198525
14 199824
15 199822
16 199915
17 201215
18 199213
19 199512
20 198811

About Jacques Curély

Jacques Curély is a scholar working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Condensed Matter Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Spectroscopy and Inorganic Chemistry, having authored 38 papers that have together received 819 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetism in coordination complexes (18 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (16 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (10 papers), Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (5 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (5 papers), Quantum many-body systems (4 papers), Metal-Catalyzed Oxygenation Mechanisms (4 papers) and Magneto-Optical Properties and Applications (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (559 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (284 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (230 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (195 citations) and Oncology (145 citations). Jacques Curély has collaborated with scholars based in France, Russia and Spain. Frequent co-authors include R. Georges, Eugenio Coronado, J. C. Gianduzzo, Marc Drillon, J.J. Borrás-Almenar, J. Rouch, Miguel Julve, Francesc Lloret, Pascal Panizza and Olivier Kahn. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. B, Condensed matter, Physica B Condensed Matter, Journal of Applied Physics, Inorganic Chemistry and Physics Letters A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact