Jacob Hascalovici

546 citations
19 papers · 437 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Jacob Hascalovici

12 papers receiving 426 citations

Peers

Jacob Hascalovici
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Neurology 79
  • Biological Psychiatry 19
  • Neurology 86
  • Pharmacology 71
  • Molecular Biology 263
Replace Hillel Zukor with:
Hillel Zukor Canada
Abhishek Desai United States
Amalia Merelli Argentina
Buffie Clodfelder‐Miller United States
Bo Yin China
Sebastian Liber Poland
Xiaohua Ju China
Soriba Cissé Canada
Jacob Hascalovici relative to Hillel Zukor Canada Hillel Zukor's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Hillel Zukor · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jacob Hascalovici

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jacob Hascalovici's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jacob Hascalovici with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jacob Hascalovici more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jacob Hascalovici

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jacob Hascalovici. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jacob Hascalovici. The network helps show where Jacob Hascalovici may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jacob Hascalovici, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jacob Hascalovici Line = papers co-authored together Jacob Hascalovici links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2009246
2 200960
3 201258
4 200822
5 201621
6 201415
7 20195
8 20184
9
Point To Area of Pain: A Clinically Useful Telehealth Physical Exam Technique for Focal Nociceptive and Neuropathic Pain.
20223
10 20211
11 20201
12 20081
13 20250
14 20220
15 20230
16 20250
17 20200
18 20200
19 20210

About Jacob Hascalovici

Jacob Hascalovici is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery, Molecular Biology and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, having authored 19 papers that have together received 437 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (6 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (5 papers), Heme Oxygenase-1 and Carbon Monoxide (4 papers), Pain Management and Treatment (3 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (2 papers), Spinal Hematomas and Complications (2 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (2 papers) and Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (79 citations), Biological Psychiatry (19 citations), Neurology (86 citations), Pharmacology (71 citations) and Molecular Biology (263 citations). Jacob Hascalovici has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Hyman M. Schipper, Hillel Zukor, Wei Song, Jacob Vaya, Soliman Khatib, Matthew S. Robbins, Christina Holcroft, David A. Bennett, Zoe Arvanitakis and Wei Song. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurochemistry, Pain Medicine, Alzheimer s & Dementia, Journal of Neuroscience and Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact