Jack Porter

41 papers receiving 899 citations

Jack Porter's Hit Papers

Valid t-ratio Inference for IV 2022 · 146 citations
1460+1+2Years since publication4080120

Peers

Jack Porter
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Algebra and Number Theory 147
  • Geometry and Topology 214
  • Management Science and Operations Research 209
  • Statistics and Probability 133
  • Mathematical Physics 111
Replace Wai‐Yin Poon with:
Wai‐Yin Poon Hong Kong
Krzysztof Ostaszewski United States
Marcel K. Richter United States
David Cook Hong Kong
Paul Higgins United Kingdom
Kerry Back United States
Myrna Wooders United States
Jean‐Yves Jaffray France
Koji Okuguchi Japan
Fabio Maccheroni Italy
Jack Porter relative to Wai‐Yin Poon Hong Kong Wai‐Yin Poon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Wai‐Yin Poon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jack Porter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jack Porter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jack Porter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jack Porter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jack Porter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jack Porter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jack Porter. The network helps show where Jack Porter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jack Porter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jack Porter Line = papers co-authored together Jack Porter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Estimation in the Regression Discontinuity Model
2003172
2 2001149
3
Valid t-ratio Inference for IV
Hit paper breakdown →
2022146
4 2015124
5 196984
6 197555
7 196955
8 197347
9 201543
10 198127
11 200323
12 197920
13 198216
14
How Dangerous Are Drinking Drivers
200113
15 198513
16
Cardinalities of h-closed spaces
198212
17 200210
18 197010
19 20039
20 20127

About Jack Porter

Jack Porter is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Management Science and Operations Research, Algebra and Number Theory, Mathematical Physics and Statistics and Probability, having authored 45 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Topology and Set Theory (18 papers), Fuzzy and Soft Set Theory (11 papers), Rings, Modules, and Algebras (10 papers), Statistical Methods and Inference (7 papers), Advanced Banach Space Theory (7 papers), Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (5 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (5 papers) and Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Algebra and Number Theory (147 citations), Geometry and Topology (214 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (209 citations), Statistics and Probability (133 citations) and Mathematical Physics (111 citations). Jack Porter has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Steven D. Levitt, J. D. R. Thomas, Marcelo J. Moreira, Justin McCrary, David S. Lee, Ariel Pakes, Kate Ho, Joy Ishii, John Meurig Thomas and R. Grant Woods. Their work appears in journals such as Pacific Journal of Mathematics, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, Journal of Econometrics, Carbohydrate Research and Chemical Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact