Mikuláš Teich

1.7k citations
41 papers · 792 · h-index 11

Impact in

    • History of Science and Natural History
    • Historical Philosophy and Science
  • History top 0.5%
    • Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
    • Scottish History and National Identity

Papers in

Mikuláš Teich

37 papers receiving 487 citations

Peers

Mikuláš Teich
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • History and Philosophy of Science 160
  • History 218
  • Anthropology 115
  • Religious studies 47
  • Classics 31
Replace Hugh Trevor-Roper with:
Hugh Trevor-Roper United States
Jacques Revel France
F.R. Ankersmit Netherlands
Frank M. Turner United States
Dorinda Outram United States
J. W. Burrow United Kingdom
Bernard W. Sheehan United States
William E. Burns United States
Alfred J. Bingham France
James Beattie New Zealand
Mikuláš Teich relative to Hugh Trevor-Roper United States Hugh Trevor-Roper's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Hugh Trevor-Roper · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mikuláš Teich

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mikuláš Teich's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mikuláš Teich with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mikuláš Teich more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mikuláš Teich

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mikuláš Teich. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mikuláš Teich. The network helps show where Mikuláš Teich may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Mikuláš Teich, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mikuláš Teich Line = papers co-authored together Mikuláš Teich links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1981320
2
Nature and society in historical context
199779
3 198654
4 199553
5 199434
6 198732
7 197631
8 199429
9 199227
10 198518
11
The Scientific Revolution. A Historiographical Inquiry
199617
12 200010
13 19967
14 20116
15 19956
16 19755
17 19815
18 19685
19 19985
20 19925

About Mikuláš Teich

Mikuláš Teich is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and History, having authored 41 papers that have together received 792 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include History of Science and Medicine (4 papers), Eastern European Communism and Reforms (4 papers), Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics (2 papers), Polish Historical and Cultural Studies (2 papers), History and advancements in chemistry (2 papers), History of Science and Natural History (2 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (2 papers) and Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (160 citations), History (218 citations), Anthropology (115 citations), Religious studies (47 citations) and Classics (31 citations). Mikuláš Teich has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and South Sudan. Frequent co-authors include Roy Porter, Roy Porter, Bo G. Gustafsson, Stanley Hoffmann, William J. Connell, Robert Young, István Várkonyi, Roy Porter, Andrew Sherratt and E. J. Lund. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, History of Science, The British Journal for the History of Science, East Central Europe and Foreign Affairs.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact