Brooke Hindle

1.3k citations
63 papers · 692 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Brooke Hindle

48 papers receiving 426 citations

Peers

Brooke Hindle
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
  • History and Philosophy of Science 212
  • Theoretical Computer Science 19
  • General Psychology 12
  • Anthropology 91
  • Philosophy 85
Replace Robert H. Kargon with:
Robert H. Kargon United States
John Herman Randall United States
A. C. Crombie United Kingdom
Crosbie Smith United Kingdom
Richard Olson United States
Roger Hahn United States
A. Rupert Hall United Kingdom
Thomas Sprat
Everett Mendelsohn United States
Richard Yeo Australia
Brooke Hindle relative to Robert H. Kargon United States Robert H. Kargon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Robert H. Kargon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Brooke Hindle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brooke Hindle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brooke Hindle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brooke Hindle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brooke Hindle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brooke Hindle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brooke Hindle. The network helps show where Brooke Hindle may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Brooke Hindle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Brooke Hindle Line = papers co-authored together Brooke Hindle links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 63 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1971157
2 196169
3 198351
4 195244
5 198242
6 198724
7 198622
8 195621
9 196018
10 197916
11 196515
12 196015
13 195714
14 197611
15 196810
16 195310
17 197010
18 19839
19 19779
20 19868

About Brooke Hindle

Brooke Hindle is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Political Science and International Relations, Marketing, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and History, having authored 63 papers that have together received 692 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (6 papers), History of Science and Natural History (4 papers), History of Science and Medicine (3 papers), American History and Culture (2 papers), American Environmental and Regional History (2 papers), Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies (2 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (2 papers) and Historical and Literary Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (212 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (19 citations), General Psychology (12 citations), Anthropology (91 citations) and Philosophy (85 citations). Brooke Hindle has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and China. Frequent co-authors include Robert E. Schofield, Steven W. Usselman, Carl B. Cone, Merritt Roe Smith, Asa Briggs, Raymond P. Stearns, Whitfield J. Bell, Steven Lubar, Anthony F. C. Wallace and Henry Guerlac. Their work appears in journals such as Technology and Culture, Journal of American History, The William and Mary Quarterly, The American Historical Review and Isis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact