Jack D. Hill

1.4k citations
11 papers · 236 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Jack D. Hill

8 papers receiving 210 citations

Peers

Jack D. Hill
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 131
  • Gender Studies 52
  • Archeology 4
  • History and Philosophy of Science 17
  • Sociology and Political Science 134
Replace Emily M. Nett with:
Emily M. Nett Canada
Mildred Dickemann United States
Lyle B. Steadman United States
Mateo Peñaherrera‐Aguirre United States
Elizabeth W. Reed United States
C. W. M. Hart United States
Qiao-Qiao He China
Griet Vandermassen Belgium
Christopher F. Tilley United Kingdom
Robert A. Paul United States
Jack D. Hill relative to Emily M. Nett Canada Emily M. Nett's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Emily M. Nett · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jack D. Hill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jack D. Hill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jack D. Hill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jack D. Hill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jack D. Hill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jack D. Hill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jack D. Hill. The network helps show where Jack D. Hill may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Jack D. Hill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jack D. Hill Line = papers co-authored together Jack D. Hill links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 1984178
2 198440
3 19895
4 19884
5 19964
6 19902
7 20241
8 19971
9 20241
10 19860
11 20250

About Jack D. Hill

Jack D. Hill is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cultural Studies, Infectious Diseases and Molecular Biology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 236 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (6 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (5 papers), Language and cultural evolution (3 papers), Soft tissue tumor case studies (1 paper), Meningioma and schwannoma management (1 paper), Plant and animal studies (1 paper), Evolution and Science Education (1 paper) and Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (131 citations), Gender Studies (52 citations), Archeology (4 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (17 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (134 citations). Jack D. Hill has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Uganda. Frequent co-authors include Robert J. Gregory, Jonathan K. Ball, Timothy Byaruhanga, C. Patrick McClure, Louise Berry, Hannah C. Howson‐Wells, Alexander W. Tarr, Nancy A. Allen, Matthew Loose and Joseph Chappell. Their work appears in journals such as Pathogens, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Microbial Genomics, International Journal of Clinical Practice and IJID Regions.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact