J.A. Pearson

24 papers receiving 369 citations

Peers

J.A. Pearson
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Ophthalmology 42
  • Health 31
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 74
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 10
  • Applied Psychology 12
Replace Daniel M. Levinson with:
Daniel M. Levinson United States
Julia Wallace United States
David L. Stewart United States
Peter Clark United States
T Alajouanine France
Corey Horien United States
Yumiko Inoue Japan
M Berthier Argentina
Christopher P. Cheyne United Kingdom
Sophie Woolston United States
J.A. Pearson relative to Daniel M. Levinson United States Daniel M. Levinson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.3×
Daniel M. Levinson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J.A. Pearson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J.A. Pearson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.A. Pearson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.A. Pearson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J.A. Pearson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.A. Pearson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.A. Pearson. The network helps show where J.A. Pearson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J.A. Pearson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J.A. Pearson Line = papers co-authored together J.A. Pearson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Ferromagnetism of intraocular foreign body causes unilateral blindness after MR study.
198695
2 201569
3 199661
4 196839
5 201632
6 197412
7 196812
8 196812
9 197211
10 197910
11 19677
12 19736
13 19795
14 19694
15 19713
16 19673
17 19733
18 19743
19 19752
20 19732

About J.A. Pearson

J.A. Pearson is a scholar working on Physiology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology and Social Psychology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 396 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (7 papers), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (5 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (4 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (4 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (3 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (3 papers) and Virology and Viral Diseases (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (42 citations), Health (31 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (74 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (10 citations) and Applied Psychology (12 citations). J.A. Pearson has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Patrick G Paglen, W.M. Kelly, John F. MacDonald, Bernard T. Engel, Frances L. Lynch, Lauri E. Markowitz, Andrew L. Baughman, Roy C. Baron, David W. Fleming and Dean D. Erdman. Their work appears in journals such as Brain Research, Physiology & Behavior, PEDIATRICS, Nature and Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact