J. Wemer

29 papers receiving 514 citations

Peers

J. Wemer
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Pharmacology 122
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 139
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 29
  • Biochemistry 26
  • Pharmacology 57
Replace Donald D. Smyth with:
Donald D. Smyth Canada
Bangning Yu United States
Go Kito Japan
L. B. Jellett Australia
Pierre Peeters Netherlands
Norman R. Eade Canada
Louis Wj Australia
Linda N. Peterson Canada
Akito Nishida Japan
S. Erill Spain
J. Wemer relative to Donald D. Smyth Canada Donald D. Smyth's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
Donald D. Smyth · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. Wemer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Wemer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Wemer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Wemer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Wemer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Wemer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Wemer. The network helps show where J. Wemer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. Wemer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. Wemer Line = papers co-authored together J. Wemer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999108
2 200182
3 198167
4 197951
5 199946
6 199929
7 199428
8 198226
9 199415
10 199613
11 199711
12 198911
13 198611
14 199110
15 19969
16 19938
17 19887
18 19896
19
Positive inotropic effects of milrinone, sulmazole and AR-L100 on isolated normal and infarcted hearts of the rat.
19895
20 19924

About J. Wemer

J. Wemer is a scholar working on Physiology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Molecular Biology, Pharmacology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 29 papers that have together received 570 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (6 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (3 papers), Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology (3 papers), Asthma and respiratory diseases (3 papers), Respiratory and Cough-Related Research (3 papers), Phosphodiesterase function and regulation (2 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers) and Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (122 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (139 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (29 citations), Biochemistry (26 citations) and Pharmacology (57 citations). J. Wemer has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include J. H. G. Jonkman, A.H. Mulder, B. Oosterhuis, Wim J. Tamminga, Anton N. M. Schoffelmeer, L.F.M.H. de Leij, Lou de Leij, Dick de Zeeuw, Jaap Wieling and Bob Wilffert. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Human & Experimental Toxicology, Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, Inflammation Research and Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact