J. McGill

2.0k citations
52 papers · 1.5k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

J. McGill

49 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

J. McGill
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 379
  • Hematology 159
  • Cancer Research 200
  • Radiation 85
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 122
Replace T. Kishimoto with:
T. Kishimoto Japan
Tetsuo Yamazaki Japan
Fred E. Bertrand United States
Michael G. Irving Australia
Sakae Saito Japan
Michael L. Fitzgerald United States
Yoshiko Hashimoto Japan
Hideo Sakamoto Japan
S. Okada Japan
M. Higuchi Japan
J. McGill relative to T. Kishimoto Japan T. Kishimoto's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.9×
T. Kishimoto · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. McGill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. McGill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. McGill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. McGill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. McGill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. McGill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. McGill. The network helps show where J. McGill may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. McGill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. McGill Line = papers co-authored together J. McGill links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1984251
2 1992157
3 1981119
4 1980114
5 1986107
6 198369
7 198164
8 198956
9 201047
10 198745
11
Chromosome microdissection identifies cryptic sites of DNA sequence amplification in human ovarian carcinoma.
199539
12
Effects of hydroxyurea on extrachromosomal DNA in patients with advanced ovarian carcinomas.
200136
13 198136
14 199335
15 198525
16 201524
17 199321
18 198920
19 199618
20 199715

About J. McGill

J. McGill is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Radiation, Genetics and Surgery, having authored 52 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nuclear physics research studies (8 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (6 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (5 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (4 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (4 papers), Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (4 papers), Particle Detector Development and Performance (4 papers) and Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (379 citations), Hematology (159 citations), Cancer Research (200 citations), Radiation (85 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (122 citations). J. McGill has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Slovenia. Frequent co-authors include Charleen M. Moore, Susan L. Naylor, Feifei Yang, J B Lum, Daniel D. Von Hoff, B H Bowman, G. W. Hoffmann, L. Ray, K K Davidson and Geoffrey M. Wahl. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Physics Letters B, Nature, Physical Review Letters and Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact