J. Mark Porter

56 papers receiving 942 citations

Peers

J. Mark Porter
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 300
  • Occupational Therapy 140
  • Social Psychology 620
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 46
  • Pharmacology 357
Replace L.F.M. Kuijt‐Evers with:
L.F.M. Kuijt‐Evers Netherlands
Walter Rohmert Germany
Min K. Chung South Korea
Jeffrey E. Fernandez United States
Stephan Konz United States
Gwanseob Shin South Korea
Stephen Pheasant United Kingdom
Yung-Hui Lee Taiwan
Frank Krause Netherlands
T. Bosch Netherlands
J. Mark Porter relative to L.F.M. Kuijt‐Evers Netherlands L.F.M. Kuijt‐Evers's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
L.F.M. Kuijt‐Evers · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. Mark Porter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Mark Porter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Mark Porter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Mark Porter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Mark Porter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Mark Porter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Mark Porter. The network helps show where J. Mark Porter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. Mark Porter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. Mark Porter Line = papers co-authored together J. Mark Porter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 62 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002126
2 1999117
3 199895
4 200190
5 200372
6 200566
7 200360
8 199858
9 197542
10 201441
11 197638
12 200426
13
Anthropometric study to update minimum aircraft seating standards
200124
14 200221
15 200416
16 200014
17 200514
18 197911
19 19809
20
HADRIAN: an integrated design ergonomics analysis tool
20029

About J. Mark Porter

J. Mark Porter is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Pharmacology, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Biomedical Engineering and Transportation, having authored 62 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders (33 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (11 papers), Effects of Vibration on Health (9 papers), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (7 papers), Ergonomics and Human Factors (5 papers), Urban Transport and Accessibility (4 papers), Traffic and Road Safety (3 papers) and Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (300 citations), Occupational Therapy (140 citations), Social Psychology (620 citations), Medical Laboratory Technology (46 citations) and Pharmacology (357 citations). J. Mark Porter has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Diane Gyi, Gary Burnett, Russell Marshall, Keith Case, Ruth Sims, James Horne, K. Case, Hilary Tait, Noelle Robertson and James A. Horne. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Ergonomics, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part B Journal of Engineering Manufacture, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Occupational Medicine and International Journal of Vehicle Design.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact