J. Lin

5.3k citations
42 papers · 854 · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

J. Lin

40 papers receiving 821 citations

Peers

J. Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 445
  • Management Science and Operations Research 140
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 82
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 151
  • Management Information Systems 40
Replace Peter Ryan with:
Peter Ryan United States
Balaram Dey India
Ralf Neubert Germany
Thomas Stahl Switzerland
Ranjan Bhattacharya India
Steve Buckley United States
Jintao Cao China
Richard Watson Australia
Vipul Jain United States
V. Senthil India
J. Lin relative to Peter Ryan United States Peter Ryan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13.5×
Peter Ryan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Lin. The network helps show where J. Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. Lin Line = papers co-authored together J. Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200183
2 200164
3 201957
4 199551
5 200348
6 200341
7 200339
8 201535
9 200734
10 200331
11 199428
12 200328
13 200528
14 200523
15 199422
16 200621
17 200120
18 200017
19 200417
20 200516

About J. Lin

J. Lin is a scholar working on Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Management Science and Operations Research, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Strategy and Management, having authored 42 papers that have together received 854 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization (15 papers), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (10 papers), Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms (10 papers), Assembly Line Balancing Optimization (9 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (8 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (4 papers), Transport and Economic Policies (4 papers) and Manufacturing Process and Optimization (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (445 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (140 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (82 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (151 citations) and Management Information Systems (40 citations). J. Lin has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Fu‐Kwun Wang, Tsin-Fu Jiang, Chen–Fu Chien, Chi-Chun Lee, John T. W. Yeow, A. Biekert, D. N. McKinsey, S. A. Hertel, V. Velan and V.B. Mikhailik. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Production Research, Physical Review A, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics and Production Planning & Control.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact