J. Fraser

1.2k citations
44 papers · 944 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

J. Fraser

42 papers receiving 918 citations

Peers

J. Fraser
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Condensed Matter Physics 201
  • Materials Chemistry 595
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 593
  • Biomedical Engineering 425
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 304
Replace S. Godey with:
S. Godey France
M. Tłaczała Poland
Mau‐Phon Houng Taiwan
А.А. Еvtukh Ukraine
Lucia V. Mercaldo Italy
Emanuele Francesco Pecora Italy
S. Fernández Spain
F. González‐Posada France
Koichiro Takahashi Japan
Renjie Chen United States
J. Fraser relative to S. Godey France S. Godey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
S. Godey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. Fraser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Fraser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Fraser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Fraser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Fraser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Fraser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Fraser. The network helps show where J. Fraser may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. Fraser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. Fraser Line = papers co-authored together J. Fraser links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996119
2 2001104
3 1996103
4 199966
5 200361
6 200253
7 199851
8 199941
9 200238
10 200235
11 201829
12 200225
13 199924
14 200222
15 200419
16 199616
17 199715
18 199214
19 200312
20 199511

About J. Fraser

J. Fraser is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biomedical Engineering and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, having authored 44 papers that have together received 944 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Semiconductor materials and devices (13 papers), Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (12 papers), Silicon Nanostructures and Photoluminescence (10 papers), Nanowire Synthesis and Applications (9 papers), Anodic Oxide Films and Nanostructures (7 papers), Ion-surface interactions and analysis (7 papers), GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials (7 papers) and Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (201 citations), Materials Chemistry (595 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (593 citations), Biomedical Engineering (425 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (304 citations). J. Fraser has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Patrik Schmuki, D. J. Lockwood, H. J. Labbé, S. Moisa, J. A. Bardwell, Philip J. Poole, H. Tang, J. B. Webb, M. J. Graham and H.S. Isaacs. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Physics Letters, Journal of The Electrochemical Society, Journal of Crystal Growth, Journal of Applied Physics and Semiconductor Science and Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact