J. F. Carson
Impact in
- Biochemistry top 10%
- Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism
- Organic Chemistry top 10%
- Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis
Papers in
-
- Chemical Synthesis and Reactions 7
- Sulfur-Based Synthesis Techniques 7
- Organic Chemistry Cycloaddition Reactions 4
-
- Biopolymer Synthesis and Applications 4
- Co-authors
- Robert E. Lundin (5 shared papers)Robert R. Becker (1 shared paper)Michael R. Gumbmann (1 shared paper)Joseph Wagner (1 shared paper)Mendel Mazelis (1 shared paper)Sigmund Schwimmer (1 shared paper)Harold E. Edgerton (1 shared paper)William Gaffield (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Journal of Organic Chemistry (13 papers)Journal of the American Chemical Society (10 papers)Synthesis (4 papers)Nature (3 papers)Journal of the Chemical Society Perkin Transactions 1 (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
J. F. Carson
43 papers receiving 620 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
- Biochemistry 73
- Organic Chemistry 209
- Plant Science 262
- Pharmacology 49
- Food Science 78
Countries citing papers authored by J. F. Carson
This map shows the geographic impact of J. F. Carson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. F. Carson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. F. Carson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. F. Carson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. F. Carson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. F. Carson. The network helps show where J. F. Carson may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 13 scholars most cited alongside J. F. Carson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1987 | 92 | |
| 2 | 1961 | 66 | |
| 3 | 1955 | 41 | |
| 4 | 1977 | 37 | |
| 5 | 1964 | 36 | |
| 6 | 1966 | 34 | |
| 7 | 1966 | 33 | |
| 8 | 1966 | 31 | |
| 9 | 1961 | 26 | |
| 10 | 1952 | 24 | |
| 11 | 1956 | 23 | |
| 12 | 1959 | 21 | |
| 13 | 1955 | 20 | |
| 14 | 1981 | 20 | |
| 15 | 1951 | 18 | |
| 16 | 1955 | 18 | |
| 17 | 1960 | 17 | |
| 18 | 1959 | 17 | |
| 19 | 1953 | 16 | |
| 20 | 1970 | 11 |
About J. F. Carson
J. F. Carson is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Spectroscopy and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, having authored 43 papers that have together received 713 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chemical Synthesis and Reactions (7 papers), Sulfur-Based Synthesis Techniques (7 papers), Garlic and Onion Studies (6 papers), Organic Chemistry Cycloaddition Reactions (4 papers), Fungal Plant Pathogen Control (4 papers), Biopolymer Synthesis and Applications (4 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (4 papers) and Sulfur Compounds in Biology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (73 citations), Organic Chemistry (209 citations), Plant Science (262 citations), Pharmacology (49 citations) and Food Science (78 citations). J. F. Carson has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert E. Lundin, Robert R. Becker, Michael R. Gumbmann, Joseph Wagner, Mendel Mazelis, Sigmund Schwimmer, Harold E. Edgerton, William Gaffield, Harold S. Olcott and William J. Weston. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Organic Chemistry, Journal of the American Chemical Society, Synthesis, Nature and Journal of the Chemical Society Perkin Transactions 1.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.