J. E. Orme

525 citations
48 papers · 388 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

J. E. Orme

41 papers receiving 297 citations

Peers

J. E. Orme
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • General Psychology 14
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 88
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 110
  • Applied Psychology 28
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 82
Replace Albert J. Silverman with:
Albert J. Silverman United States
Robert Roessler United States
Stanley D. Porteus United States
Howard Gudeman United States
J.C. Boulougouris Greece
John R. Lick United States
Patricia A. Register United States
James Hart Australia
David P. Nowlis United States
Jane Baker United Kingdom
J. E. Orme relative to Albert J. Silverman United States Albert J. Silverman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Albert J. Silverman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. E. Orme

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. E. Orme's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. E. Orme with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. E. Orme more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. E. Orme

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. E. Orme. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. E. Orme. The network helps show where J. E. Orme may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside J. E. Orme, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. E. Orme Line = papers co-authored together J. E. Orme links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197027
2 196325
3 197225
4 198322
5 196621
6 196620
7 196220
8 196419
9 196218
10 195418
11 196515
12 195713
13 196213
14
Development of Computerized Critical Care Protocols-A Strategy That Really Works!
199012
15 195512
16 197911
17 19579
18 19757
19 19726
20 19856

About J. E. Orme

J. E. Orme is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 48 papers that have together received 388 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychological Testing and Assessment (9 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (6 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (5 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (5 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (4 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs (3 papers) and Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (14 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (88 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (110 citations), Applied Psychology (28 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (82 citations). J. E. Orme has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include R. J. Kerry, A. C. Tait, T. P. Clemmer, Jenifer M. Holden, J. E. Tong and Rebecca Gosling. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Psychology, The British Journal of Psychiatry, Acta Psychologica, British Journal of Psychology and Nature.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact