Jane Baker
Impact in
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Sensory Systems top 10%
- Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
Papers in
-
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies 2
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies 2
- Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation 1
-
- Mental Health Research Topics 2
- Cognitive Abilities and Testing 2
- Co-authors
- Shelley Channon (8 shared papers)Mary M. Robertson (5 shared papers)Thomas J. Bałkany (1 shared paper)Damian Farrow (1 shared paper)Bruce Elliott (1 shared paper)John E. Anderson (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Abnormal Psychology (2 papers)Applied Cognitive Psychology (1 paper)The Laryngoscope (1 paper)Personality and Individual Differences (1 paper)Cognition & Emotion (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesSerbia
In The Last Decade
Jane Baker
12 papers receiving 352 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Cognitive Neuroscience 213
- Sensory Systems 42
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 94
- General Decision Sciences 12
- Psychiatry and Mental health 90
Countries citing papers authored by Jane Baker
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Baker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Baker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Baker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Baker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Baker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Baker. The network helps show where Jane Baker may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Jane Baker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1993 | 100 | |
| 2 | 1993 | 58 | |
| 3 | 1989 | 58 | |
| 4 | 1994 | 48 | |
| 5 | 1993 | 27 | |
| 6 | 1994 | 24 | |
| 7 | 1993 | 21 | |
| 8 | 1995 | 19 | |
| 9 | 1996 | 11 | |
| 10 | The influence of processing time on expert anticipation | 2009 | 10 |
| 11 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2008 | 0 |
About Jane Baker
Jane Baker is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, having authored 13 papers that have together received 378 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Educational and Psychological Assessments (3 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (2 papers), Diverse Educational Innovations Studies (2 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (2 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (2 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (1 paper) and Early Childhood Education and Development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (213 citations), Sensory Systems (42 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (94 citations), General Decision Sciences (12 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (90 citations). Jane Baker has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Serbia. Frequent co-authors include Shelley Channon, Mary M. Robertson, Thomas J. Bałkany, Damian Farrow, Bruce Elliott and John E. Anderson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Abnormal Psychology, Applied Cognitive Psychology, The Laryngoscope, Personality and Individual Differences and Cognition & Emotion.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.