J. E. M. Goldsmith

82 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

J. E. M. Goldsmith
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Spectroscopy 837
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 219
  • Atmospheric Science 587
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 754
  • Global and Planetary Change 499
Replace Roger L. Farrow with:
Roger L. Farrow United States
P. Ewart United Kingdom
J. J. ter Meulen Netherlands
Erhard W. Rothe United States
W. T. Rawlins United States
L. Monchick United States
Alan C. Eckbreth Ireland
Kermit C. Smyth United States
C.H. Kruger United States
Zhi‐Yun Li United States
J. E. M. Goldsmith relative to Roger L. Farrow United States Roger L. Farrow's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Roger L. Farrow · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. E. M. Goldsmith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. E. M. Goldsmith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. E. M. Goldsmith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. E. M. Goldsmith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. E. M. Goldsmith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. E. M. Goldsmith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. E. M. Goldsmith. The network helps show where J. E. M. Goldsmith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. E. M. Goldsmith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. E. M. Goldsmith Line = papers co-authored together J. E. M. Goldsmith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 87 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998211
2 2013112
3 1979108
4 1981100
5 200676
6 198776
7 198975
8 198974
9 199070
10 198366
11 198563
12 198060
13 197859
14 198555
15 201348
16 198648
17 199047
18 198247
19 198646
20 199040

About J. E. M. Goldsmith

J. E. M. Goldsmith is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 87 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (35 papers), Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics (34 papers), Atmospheric aerosols and clouds (22 papers), Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (18 papers), Laser Design and Applications (15 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (9 papers), Atmospheric Ozone and Climate (8 papers) and Advancements in Photolithography Techniques (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (837 citations), Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (219 citations), Atmospheric Science (587 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (754 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (499 citations). J. E. M. Goldsmith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Germany. Frequent co-authors include David D. Turner, J. E. Lawler, Scott E. Bisson, Frank P. Tully, R. J. Anderson, Ulf Westblom, Normand M. Laurendeau, Eric A. Rohlfing, E. W. Weber and A. L. Schawlow. Their work appears in journals such as Optics Letters, Physical Review Letters, Journal of the Optical Society of America B, The Journal of Chemical Physics and Applied Physics B.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact