J. E. Bower

2.7k citations
68 papers · 2.3k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

J. E. Bower

67 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

J. E. Bower
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1.3k
  • Materials Chemistry 941
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 140
  • Atmospheric Science 271
  • Condensed Matter Physics 176
Replace R. Brako with:
R. Brako Croatia
Bo Hellsing Sweden
Johannes Trost Germany
Daniel Farı́as Spain
G. Comsa Germany
W.G. Breiland United States
Haskell Taub United States
M. Alducin Spain
K. H. Rieder Germany
Joseph M. Jasinski United States
J. E. Bower relative to R. Brako Croatia R. Brako's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
R. Brako · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. E. Bower

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. E. Bower's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. E. Bower with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. E. Bower more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. E. Bower

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. E. Bower. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. E. Bower. The network helps show where J. E. Bower may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. E. Bower, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. E. Bower Line = papers co-authored together J. E. Bower links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 68 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1987211
2 1992182
3 1985179
4 1994148
5 1987125
6 198998
7 198998
8 200683
9 198881
10 199768
11 198961
12 200355
13 199354
14 198654
15 200452
16 198850
17 200349
18 199242
19 198742
20 199034

About J. E. Bower

J. E. Bower is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Computational Mechanics, Surfaces, Coatings and Films, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, having authored 68 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (17 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (14 papers), Ion-surface interactions and analysis (14 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (11 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (9 papers), Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design (8 papers), Advanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies (6 papers) and Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.3k citations), Materials Chemistry (941 citations), Surfaces, Coatings and Films (140 citations), Atmospheric Science (271 citations) and Condensed Matter Physics (176 citations). J. E. Bower has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Martin F. Jarrold, Joe S. Kraus, Kathleen M. Creegan, James L. Fye, Joanna M. Hunter, J. Kwo, Minghwei Hong, Urmi Ray, Frank J. DiSalvo and D. B. McWhan. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, Journal of the American Chemical Society, Chemical Physics Letters, Optics Letters and Applied Physics Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact