J. C. MAXWELL

1.2k citations
43 papers · 260 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

J. C. MAXWELL

24 papers receiving 159 citations

Peers

J. C. MAXWELL
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Literature and Literary Theory 49
  • Classics 16
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 43
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 49
  • Anthropology 24
Replace George P. Mayhew with:
George P. Mayhew United States
Ernest T. Klein
Geneviève Rodis-Lewis United Kingdom
Jerome Stolnitz United States
Michael Lieb United States
Owen Barfield
Walther Riese United States
Robert Kantor Poland
Stein Haugom Olsen Norway
John Brough United States
J. C. MAXWELL relative to George P. Mayhew United States George P. Mayhew's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
George P. Mayhew · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. C. MAXWELL

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. C. MAXWELL's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. C. MAXWELL with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. C. MAXWELL more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. C. MAXWELL

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. C. MAXWELL. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. C. MAXWELL. The network helps show where J. C. MAXWELL may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside J. C. MAXWELL, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. C. MAXWELL Line = papers co-authored together J. C. MAXWELL links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004111
2 195627
3 197516
4 196416
5 197213
6 197612
7 19719
8 19518
9 19686
10 19635
11 19524
12 19764
13 19703
14 19532
15 19612
16 19692
17 19692
18 19652
19 19762
20 19621

About J. C. MAXWELL

J. C. MAXWELL is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Political Science and International Relations, Infectious Diseases, Social Psychology and Ecology, having authored 43 papers that have together received 260 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (4 papers), Digital Humanities and Scholarship (1 paper), Face Recognition and Perception (1 paper), Political and Economic history of UK and US (1 paper), SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing (1 paper), Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics (1 paper), Law in Society and Culture (1 paper) and Samuel Beckett and Modernism (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (49 citations), Classics (16 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (43 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (49 citations) and Anthropology (24 citations). J. C. MAXWELL has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Richard J. Davidson, Alexander J. Shackman, I.Y. Borg, W. B. Stanford, Irving Ribner, Scott Bennett, Ronald Gottesman, G. K. Hunter, John Lucas and Helen Gardner. Their work appears in journals such as Notes and Queries, The Modern Language Review, The Review of English Studies, American Journal of Science and Essays in Criticism.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact