J. C. MAXWELL

1.2k citations
37 papers · 190 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

J. C. MAXWELL

21 papers receiving 132 citations

Peers

J. C. MAXWELL
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Literature and Literary Theory 38
  • Classics 9
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 46
  • Anthropology 19
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 22
Replace Michael Lieb with:
Michael Lieb United States
Marcia Allentuck United States
Otto Erich Deutsch
Wande Abimbola Canada
Sharon L. James United States
Angus Fletcher United States
Herschel B. Chipp United States
Maynard Solomon United States
Guillemette Bolens Switzerland
Walther Riese United States
J. C. MAXWELL relative to Michael Lieb United States Michael Lieb's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Michael Lieb · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. C. MAXWELL

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. C. MAXWELL's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. C. MAXWELL with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. C. MAXWELL more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. C. MAXWELL

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. C. MAXWELL. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. C. MAXWELL. The network helps show where J. C. MAXWELL may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside J. C. MAXWELL, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. C. MAXWELL Line = papers co-authored together J. C. MAXWELL links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200472
2 195623
3 197515
4 196414
5 19729
6 19718
7 19517
8 19685
9 19634
10 19524
11 19764
12 19703
13 19532
14 19612
15 19692
16 19692
17 19762
18 19601
19 19671
20 19551

About J. C. MAXWELL

J. C. MAXWELL is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Political Science and International Relations, Infectious Diseases, Social Psychology and Ecology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 190 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (3 papers), Digital Humanities and Scholarship (1 paper), Face Recognition and Perception (1 paper), Political and Economic history of UK and US (1 paper), SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing (1 paper), Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics (1 paper), Law in Society and Culture (1 paper) and Samuel Beckett and Modernism (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (38 citations), Classics (9 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (46 citations), Anthropology (19 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (22 citations). J. C. MAXWELL has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Alexander J. Shackman, Richard J. Davidson, I.Y. Borg, W. B. Stanford, Ronald Gottesman, Scott Bennett, G. K. Hunter, Helen Gardner, Irving Ribner and Harold Jenkins. Their work appears in journals such as Notes and Queries, The Modern Language Review, The Review of English Studies, American Journal of Science and Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact