Michael Lieb

513 citations
30 papers · 211 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Lieb

23 papers receiving 150 citations

Peers

Michael Lieb
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Religious studies 21
  • Literature and Literary Theory 43
  • Classics 11
  • History 25
  • Clinical Psychology 46
Replace Marcel Proust with:
Marcel Proust Germany
William Hazlitt
David Wagenknecht
Leo Steinberg United States
Meyer Schapiro United States
Clare Cavanagh United States
Andrew Elfenbein United States
T. V. F. Brogan United States
Allan Ingram United Kingdom
Mary Thomas Crane United States
Michael Lieb relative to Marcel Proust Germany Marcel Proust's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Marcel Proust · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Lieb

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Lieb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Lieb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Lieb more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Lieb

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Lieb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Lieb. The network helps show where Michael Lieb may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Michael Lieb, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Lieb Line = papers co-authored together Michael Lieb links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199272
2
Achievements of the left hand : essays on the prose of John Milton
197428
3
Literary Milton: Text, Pretext, Context
199421
4 199616
5 198512
6 19988
7
The dialectics of creation : patterns of birth & regeneration in Paradise lost
19707
8 19986
9 19706
10 19874
11 19964
12 19864
13 19914
14
The Miltonic Samson
19972
15 20032
16 19892
17 20022
18
"Paradise Lost: A Poem Written in Ten Books": An Authoritative Text of the 1667 First Edition
20072
19
"Paradise Lost: A Poem Written in Ten Books": Essays on the 1667 First Edition
20072
20 19781

About Michael Lieb

Michael Lieb is a scholar working on Religious studies, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Anthropology and History, having authored 30 papers that have together received 211 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biblical Studies and Interpretation (5 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (3 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (3 papers), Lexicography and Language Studies (2 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (2 papers), Contemporary Christian Leadership and Education (2 papers), Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies (2 papers) and Historical and Linguistic Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (21 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (43 citations), Classics (11 citations), History (25 citations) and Clinical Psychology (46 citations). Michael Lieb has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Michaël Goldman, Patricia Hanrahan, John T. Shawcross and Gordon Campbell. Their work appears in journals such as Milton Studies, Milton Quarterly, The Journal of Religion, ELH and The Modern Language Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact